Colour My World

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Colour My World

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:52 pm

This is a message to all members of this forum - post your pics :!:

The main thing to remember is that every photo is worth showing and could receive either good reviews or bad. The good reviews drive many to do better and this goes for bad reviews as well - so don’t be shy, post. Who knows one of your pics could become photo of the week or win in one of the challenges - but you have to be in it to win it. . .

Image
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby flipfrog on Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:19 pm

chris i really like this candid portrait but actually find the colour to be distracting, taking away from the subject. i like how this guy is looking down, all the age lines on his face, and it tells some kind of story.

do u have an all B&W version, or maybe just a white hat might look interesting...

composition is bang on tho!
and nice sharp image too...
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby Glen on Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:30 pm

Chris I like it! Nice concept, rather than the reverse
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Onyx on Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:48 pm

I find the blown hat to be more of a distraction than the coloured background.

Tis a fitting candid of a sad man (or woman - we can't assume anything these days). ;)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby xerubus on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:30 pm

chris... the colour and b&w version doesn't work for me... although the pp work is very well done...

i'd love to see a straight b&w version..

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby leek on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:40 pm

Message received and understood Chris...
I just wish I had a little more time available to get out, to practice and to take shots like this one...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:41 pm

xerubus wrote:chris... the colour and b&w version doesn't work for me... although the pp work is very well done...

i'd love to see a straight b&w version..

cheers


Here you go mark

Image
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Mal on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:43 pm

I like the split. The colour in the BG shows excitment and "colour" where as the subject is in the "darkness"
I like it! The fisrt one that is.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby leek on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:46 pm

sirhc55 wrote:
xerubus wrote:chris... the colour and b&w version doesn't work for me... although the pp work is very well done...

i'd love to see a straight b&w version..

cheers


Here you go mark

But now you need a new title... :lol:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Sean on Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:54 pm

I agree totally with your comments and think its great to share your images with a collective audience, you can learn so much from another opinon or two.

With repect to your picture, Its interesting how you can suggest or expand on an emotion with a change in some of the tones. It gives me another angle to think about whilst at the view finder

Cheers

Sean
"The more I learn, the less I realise I know"
User avatar
Sean
Member
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:43 am
Location: Sydney- Eastside - Australia

Postby Nicole on Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:24 pm

At first I was thinking it would be great in black and white. Then I saw that version nd I actually prefer the first one. I think the colour actually brightens up the pic.
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby xerubus on Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:34 pm

sirhc55 wrote:
xerubus wrote:chris... the colour and b&w version doesn't work for me... although the pp work is very well done...

i'd love to see a straight b&w version..

cheers


Here you go mark



much better to my eye... great shot... and without the colour it has a more emotional feel for me...

nice work Chris..

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby boxerboy on Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:37 pm

Chris,

I liked the first post, very nice bit of PP. But I must say I prefer the B&W version better. Seems to suit the subject better IMO.

Cheers
Peter
my karma just ran over your dogma
User avatar
boxerboy
Member
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Jimboomba QLD

Postby Oneputt on Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:49 pm

Another vote for B & W, but then I have always liked B & W.
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Oneputt on Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:51 pm

At a slight tangent I find that I rarely comment on a picture unless I like it, as I really don't feel qualified to make a negative comment, especially given the standard of some of the work posted here.
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Mj on Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:11 pm

I've gotta say that I like both versions... a change in treatment provides a different experience.

Can I ask though if pictures posted here can include some technical details (ss/fstop/lens maybe) so that we maybe all can learn and benefit from some of this great work...

I know that I might be able to find it embedded in the file but the technically challenged amongst us (hand held high in the air) would find this helpful.

thoughts???

Michael.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby Oneputt on Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:35 pm

Mj there are several View Exif programs that are free downloads. Do a Google and you should find something.
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:21 pm

I am going to have to fess up to something wrong that I used to do. Prior to this forum and when I used the D1 (this pic is from the D1) I never kept any EXIF data - not to sure why not but then again I used to save all of my pics to CYMK and not RGB.

I have, myself, learnt a lot from this forum and now I keep all RAW files along with a TIF file, and of course the EXIF data.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Matty B on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:30 pm

My vote is ....I prefer the original post with B&W figure on a coloured backdrop. A downbeat charactor contemplating an upbeat world around him/her? It's a very neat PS job and very easy to look at......
just my 20 cents worth!
Shoot early - Shoot often
User avatar
Matty B
Member
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria

Postby Mj on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:32 pm

Chris... no worries... love your work for the most part and always keen to understand how a photo that I enjoy was achieved (at least tehnically).

Oneputt, I have a number of exif viewers... however that would require that I download the picture and then check the exif... time does not always permit and I believe that it would be good practice for us all to provide some basis technical info about any photo we post. Also many times (as Chris has 'fessed' up) the exif gets lost through PP etc making any exif viewer useless. Perhaps it's only me who would like to set a standard like this... if so... so be it !!!

Michael.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:34 pm

I agree Mj - if every posting included the EXIF data, or at least a reason why not, it would make the viewing a lot more interesting :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby leek on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:41 pm

Mj wrote:however that would require that I download the picture and then check the exif...


Hi mj... If you download Opanda's IEXIF, you can (usually) simply right click on the image in the forum and it will give you an option to display the EXIF... It doesn't display everything, but it covers the basics...
All of the above is assuming that you use Windows of course (sorry Chris)...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Mj on Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:51 pm

Chris... was thinking just including a simply line of text to the post like...

Spec: 1/60, f/8, lens 28/1.4

Pulled down a few photos tonight and checked each exif... nothing preserved on any of them, which wouldn't be a prob if we provided a simple set of info as above. Fraid I'm not inclined to critic a photo if I have no idea how it was created. Of course if no one likes the idea, no prob... but I think many of us would benefit greatly.

Michael.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:01 pm

Michael - all of my postings from now on will include information :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Mj on Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:07 pm

Thx, John... I did indeed have that program... just haven't had the time to explore it, so on you recommendation have just installed and tried it out.
Certainly makes things easier and I'll use it now quite a bit... however still won't help for those photos where PP has interferred (quite a few on the site I think) and doesn't look like it will tell me what lens was used.

Thx again...

Michael.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby leek on Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:14 pm

Mj wrote:It doesn't look like it will tell me what lens was used.


No... unfortunately the lens information is one of the few pieces of info that is missing...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:40 am

I can tell you that the lens used for this shot was the 28-105mm Nikkor :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Oneputt on Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 am

I thinks that it is fair enough to ask for EXIF. In future I will try to remember to include it when I post.
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby stubbsy on Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:48 am

Chris
I prefer the all B&W version.

Mj
I'm usually too lazy to include EXIF data so I don't. On reflection though I agreee with what you say. This is a photographic forum not a picture forum. I'll endeavour to include EXIF data in all future posts.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Manta on Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:22 am

Thanks for posting these Chris. I can see merit in both pics but probably prefer the first if I had to make a choice.

I'm really appreciative when I see EXIF data in the main text. It really helps newer photographers like myself get a handle on technique and lens choices.

Regards,
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby mudder on Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:54 pm

The B&W version seems to have so much more emotion to me...

The subject seems either deep in thought... Nice capture...

Cheers,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques