My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesWell, I thought they were good at the time but the judges didn't agree. Maybe next time
Regards
Matt. K
Re: My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesThats OK Matt - you're in good company with me
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesWould be good to get some insight into why you picked those 2 images. The 2nd is interesting but not sure what value #1 brings to the table.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesMatt,
As you know, there's nothing "unsuccessful" about these images. That others might not appreciate them, or have chosen them above some other images is totally irrelevant. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesThese were my two unsuccessful images:
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesRodney
I have no doubt that your second image would have made it to the final cull. It exactly fits the criteria and would have been a very close contender. Re the first image, I suspect they get a lot of ANZAC day pics or similar as it's such a popular subject. So far they have resisted the urge. Rooz. The criteria is 'Sydney Life' and my first image was an example of some of the different cultural activities that go on in the CBD. The Ozzi guy walking past seems to add context. The image has some interesting elements in my opinion and they become more obvious when you examine the image at a greatly magnified size. Remember, the winners get printed as large as a barn door. Having said all that I had another contender that my gut feeling said was a good choice....but ignored it after some illogical rationale. I'm very much looking forward to seeing the exhibition this year as it's always a great show. Regards
Matt. K
Re: My 'unsuccessful' Sydney Life Comp entriesWell, you never know. It' s the luck of the game and
judges, unlike teachers, don't exactly have a marking criteria sheet that need to be followed rigorously. Art evaluation is very subjective...Better luck next time.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|