HouseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
HouseHouses make for good photographic subjects, at least IMHO. The Australian landscape is filled with thousands of decrepit ones, just waiting to be captured.
Modern beauty House1 by Ozimax, on Flickr Well ventilated House2 by Ozimax, on Flickr President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: HouseI really like the first image here ozi. Reminds me a lot of the house I live in...crooked! The house has a certain sadness about it which has only been helped by your tasteful b&w treatment.
Second image seems to lack a bit of contrast but has a film look about it which can work, maybe some local highlight dodging and shadow burning could help this one... Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Re: HouseI too like the first ozi but I reckon it might have been better without the fussiness of the fence in the way
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: House
Thanks Nathan. Yes, this house reminds me of the shack we lived in on the NSW Central Coast when I was a little kid. I drove past the place a few months ago and it has been renovated. As for the fence, I could have hopped over to take the photo, but the place looked as though a big rottie was lurking somewhere, ready to pounce and destroy any hapless photographer (or mailman) that wandered into the yard... President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|