V1 Lunar LandscapeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
V1 Lunar LandscapeNot exactly original but I was quite pleased with the ease with which I could take this with the V1-FT1-70-200 combo handheld.
I'm thinking this will come in handy for the odd sports shoot that pops up and together with a gimbal head be useful for a few surfing and birding situations. Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Re: V1 Lunar LandscapeI quite like it!
Re: V1 Lunar LandscapeSensational. Now, how about attaching it to the new (yet to come) Sigma 150-600mm? Now THAT would be reach indeed. You'll almost be able to see the moon men running around on the cheese...
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: V1 Lunar Landscape
That would certainly be reach. And almost see the moon men would be entirely accurate. The absence of acuity on the Coke Bottle would ensure that you had an extreme close up of a gigantic blurred something-scape. Michael, excellent work. The gimbal would be an essential part of the kit with the 70-210, given the level of magnification involved. We stuck the FT-1 on the back end of my 80-400; that is venturing very heavily into solid tripod country. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: V1 Lunar LandscapeI certainly think that > 200mm would only be worth considering with a solid support.
The 70-200 works ok as it is both sharp and contrasty, but even then I think a gimbal is going to be needed much of the time. Using a 400 (giving 1080) or 600 (1620) is likely to be a leap tooo far !!! Given the Moon is very bright, with high contrast to it's surrounds, it's likely that this shot actually makes the combo look better than it really is. I'll be keen to try a little sports shooting or wildlife to really test it out, and where it's shortcomings, I suspect, will become apparent. Still, always happy when a modest investment yields something better than expected Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|