OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...This was what you missed out on mate - sorry (Gerry was going to join me down at Bradleys for a sunset session but well - didn't have enough time)...
I barely made it in time - I arrived to Bradleys only moments before sunset - I quickly parked the car in the one spot that was left (thankfully) & dashed down to the water An Aside: Sitting on the rock platform off the headland is a Doric stone column. It is one of six that were taken from the demolished Sydney Post Office and placed in positions in Sydney So leave the column in (as it really was) or clone it out - what do you think? D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...The base of that column is placed almost precisely at the rule of thirds point....yet it is a real PITA! It screws the balance of the image like nothing I've seen before. Your image would make an excellent training aid in demonstrating how small elements in an image can have more pulling power than they deserve. PS: I think 'almost precisely' ........in language terms is neither here nor there.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...now that ya got my attention and all...
Having been to that location before I sympathise with your dilemma. I think Matt has pretty well nailed it, its either here or there both work in their own right but for different reasons. I am leaning towards the pole in version. With the pole included it provides a anchor point with impact, it jars the vision and gives the impression its holding the sky up - it does block and detract from the city skyline, however i reckon that part of the image is a backup, a secondary element, not a primary point and as such the pole coupled with the city works well in my eyes. It also speaks volumes about the location, other wise it could just be some other rocky foreground The pole without version is only held together by a very nice sky and some rocks and the city skyline, whilst the city is more easily detectable than the other version now feels to..small and without enough impact to really make me go... 'hmm yeah'. The sky and foreground make this image but have no anchor point, the inclusion of a prominent rock or a 'S' curve thru the rocks may have helped (if they were even there..) gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...I like it in. It’s there in reality so should be there in the photo. Change the perspective to remove it, not photoshop.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...What was really interesting is that when I showed the two versions to my wife she reckoned I had photoshop'd the pole IN
Thankyou all for taking the time to provide such excellent feedback D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...With the post as it has historical context like you first mentioned. It does catch my eye more, but for me, that's what the subject is about unless that's not what you were aiming for.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...In my opinion the post is not the problem, I think the horizon smack in the middle is what needs to go.
With this crop the post actually stops you going out of the photo and brings your eye back to the bridge. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...I like Phillip's crop suggestion for this image.
I think removal of the column leaves the image without much of a subject. I would probably also look to brighten the column to clarify it as the primary subject. Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...I see merit in Phillips crop, however i prefer the original image with the pole. I think its perfectly OK to have a horizon in the middle, in some cases, like this one there is a nice balance between the foreground rockage and the chunky sky and as such it works (for me) - additionally that pole needs some space to breathe
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...The second stands on its own merits because of that sky but I prefer the first with the pillar included.
Geoff Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...I see you're becoming quite skilled in post processing.
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...Pole in.
Although the opinions here are poles apart, I can only imagine that this time of year it is an icy pole. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...Just adding my opinion, though it may not hold much value..... I quite like it with the pole in. I was in a dilemma trying to figure out which one I liked more, until I looked at the cropped version by Phillipb. The moment I saw it cropped the post felt like it had a role in the image as Phillip but it stopped my eye from wandering off to the left and drew my attention to the sunset, the colours, the bridge and of coarse the pole.
A very good job at editing out the pole though. Kudos for that effort!! 2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: OK Gerry - With or Without the Post...Actually editing out the pole was super easy with content aware fill
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|