The Milky Way

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The Milky Way

Postby ozimax on Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:45 pm

I have been trying to take some quarter decent star photographs for years, with virtually no success. Here's an attempt from outside Tamworth last Saturday night, settings as follows:

Fuji XT-1 + 35mm F1.4 lens, ISO 1600, 8 sec exposure, jpg, manual focus, on tripod
image tweaked in Topaz Adjust 4

ImageMilkyWay1 by Ozimax, on Flickr

I took some shots at 2,3,4 secs but they seemed too underexposed. Maybe there's some star experts out there who can enlighten me as to best Fuji settings for capturing these sorts of images? Thanks.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: The Milky Way

Postby zafra52 on Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:30 pm

It is a very nice picture. I like the colours as I look at it I wonder how is it I never see as many starts? Well done!
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

The Milky Way

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:18 am

This looks to be a very good attempt Ozi.
I am puzzled though some of the stars show elongation due to the long exposure, even though I would have thought 8 sec too short for them on a 35mm lens, unless this is a crop or the camera has a tiny sensor. Also only the stars near the edge of the frame show it. Perhaps it's aberration caused by the lens.

One thing that works quite well for brightness is to take multiple short exposures and stack them on layers in Photoshop. Align them. Then use one of the layer blend modes. From memory, multiply, but I'll have to check my notes. Am away from my main computer ATM.

Try to take your photos on a cold clear calm moonless night. Movement of the air can cause distortions, and make sure you are as far from city lights as you can get. Tamworth should be ok though unless you are in the middle of town.

Giving up now. Ipad auto-incorrect is driving me crazy.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: The Milky Way

Postby Geoff M on Wed Jun 25, 2014 1:44 pm

ozimax wrote: Maybe there's some star experts out there who can enlighten me as to best Fuji settings for capturing these sorts of images? Thanks.


I am hardly an expert but I have had some degree of success using Fuji gear for shooting the stars, see this thread http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=43919&p=453364&hilit=Milky+Way#p453364 which gives some detail about settings I used. As Greg states a wider focal length is the best choice, using your XF35 (53mm in 35mm terms) is too long. The longer the focal length the greater the chance of seeing star trails. There is a formula to use that provides the approx shutter speed needed at given aperture/focal length to prevent trails happening but not sure what it is, trial and error is a good rule of thumb! Try using the 18-55 @ 18mm, f2.8
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: The Milky Way

Postby ozimax on Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:41 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:This looks to be a very good attempt Ozi.
I am puzzled though some of the stars show elongation due to the long exposure, even though I would have thought 8 sec too short for them on a 35mm lens, unless this is a crop or the camera has a tiny sensor. Also only the stars near the edge of the frame show it. Perhaps it's aberration caused by the lens.

One thing that works quite well for brightness is to take multiple short exposures and stack them on layers in Photoshop. Align them. Then use one of the layer blend modes. From memory, multiply, but I'll have to check my notes. Am away from my main computer ATM.

Try to take your photos on a cold clear calm moonless night. Movement of the air can cause distortions, and make sure you are as far from city lights as you can get. Tamworth should be ok though unless you are in the middle of town.

Giving up now. Ipad auto-incorrect is driving me crazy.


Thanks Greg. Last Saturday was a beautiful evening, far enough from the city to get a clear view of the skies, but it was very windy. I haven't tried the multiple shot/blend technique but will look at that next time I'm out west.

Thanks again for the comments.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: The Milky Way

Postby ozimax on Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:44 pm

Geoff M wrote:
ozimax wrote: Maybe there's some star experts out there who can enlighten me as to best Fuji settings for capturing these sorts of images? Thanks.


I am hardly an expert but I have had some degree of success using Fuji gear for shooting the stars, see this thread http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=43919&p=453364&hilit=Milky+Way#p453364 which gives some detail about settings I used. As Greg states a wider focal length is the best choice, using your XF35 (53mm in 35mm terms) is too long. The longer the focal length the greater the chance of seeing star trails. There is a formula to use that provides the approx shutter speed needed at given aperture/focal length to prevent trails happening but not sure what it is, trial and error is a good rule of thumb! Try using the 18-55 @ 18mm, f2.8


Thanks Geoff. I will indeed try your suggestions at the next opportunity. I did read of a "formula" to determine the shutter speed, that being 500/FL eg 500/50mm gives a 10 second exposure. I have no idea whether or not this works in most situations.

Thanks again for the feedback.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: The Milky Way

Postby ozimax on Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:46 pm

Geoff M wrote:I am hardly an expert but I have had some degree of success using Fuji gear for shooting the stars, see this thread http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=43919&p=453364&hilit=Milky+Way#p453364 which gives some detail about settings I used.


Geoff, your Milky Way post images seem to have disappeared! Lost in space.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: The Milky Way

Postby Geoff M on Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:44 pm

ozimax wrote:Geoff, your Milky Way post images seem to have disappeared! Lost in space.


My Zenfolio hosting site is currently undergoing maintenace, should be back by the morning.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques