Those nice to know things about your DSLR will be found here. How to do this, and why you probably should not do that.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by Matt. K on Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:19 pm
Just read this tip and can see its potential. If you are a landscape freak and have lots of time...set your camera up on a tripod and take 3 or 4 pics a number of hours apart....so that you capture different lighting effects. Stack them up as layers in PS and combine them at different opacities for a spectacular, or subtle, landscape. Hmmm. Great for the unemployed or unmarried.
Regards
Matt. K
-
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by georgie on Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:41 pm
Matt. K wrote:... Hmmm. Great for the unemployed or unmarried.
or without kids
Cheers
Georgie
-
georgie
- Member
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:14 pm
- Location: Runcorn, Brisbane
by Glen on Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:52 pm
It might help sell a few more cameras though. Where can you leave you camera for 8 hours unmolested?
-
Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Matt. K on Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:28 pm
Regards
Matt. K
-
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by Glen on Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:36 pm
-
Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Hlop on Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:51 pm
Glen wrote:It might help sell a few more cameras though. Where can you leave you camera for 8 hours unmolested?
Aw, you just have to have well trained pittbull (not sure about spelling) terrier chained to the tripod leg
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Killakoala on Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:57 pm
Or a good book and a chair.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-
Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by the foto fanatic on Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:34 pm
Hlop wrote:Glen wrote:It might help sell a few more cameras though. Where can you leave you camera for 8 hours unmolested?
Aw, you just have to have well trained pittbull (not sure about spelling) terrier chained to the tripod leg
I have visions of a photographer running down the street chasing a dog, which is disappearing into the distance trailling a tripod and several thousand $$$s worth of Nikon camera and lens behind it!
-
the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by BBJ on Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:51 pm
You bet me too it cricketfan, if it was my dog, she would spot a cat and be off like a rocket and knowing her the tripod wouldn't stop her either.LOL
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-
BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by atencati on Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:57 am
I read a tip like that recently elsewhere. Take 1 shot with the foreground exposed properly, sky and clouds blown, the take one of the sky exposed properly and combine the two images to get a good pic...
not sure I like the advice
Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
-
atencati
- Member
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
- Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70
-
by owen on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:09 am
atencati wrote:I read a tip like that recently elsewhere. Take 1 shot with the foreground exposed properly, sky and clouds blown, the take one of the sky exposed properly and combine the two images to get a good pic...
not sure I like the advice
Andy
Hi Andy.
This is just a way to increase the dynamic range of the image. Alternatively you can use a neutral density filter.
-
owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by Hlop on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:10 am
cricketfan wrote:I have visions of a photographer running down the street chasing a dog, which is disappearing into the distance trailling a tripod and several thousand $$$s worth of Nikon camera and lens behind it!
I knew someone will step into this trap .... Here we're getting to the point where you have to go to Birddog and buy rock solid tripod to avoid transformation of this dream to reality
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Hlop on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:12 am
owen wrote:This is just a way to increase the dynamic range of the image. Alternatively you can use a neutral density filter.
I doubt it'll help. You have to use graduated filter in this case
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by owen on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:19 am
Hlop wrote:owen wrote:This is just a way to increase the dynamic range of the image. Alternatively you can use a neutral density filter.
I doubt it'll help. You have to use graduated filter in this case
It does work Mikhail.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v717/owenschmierer/Crookhaven%20Heads/DSC_3065.jpg
This was taken from bracketing two shots and then merging together... if I hadn't done this either the sky would be blown or the foreground would be too dark.
-
owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by pippin88 on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:28 am
owen wrote:Hlop wrote:owen wrote:This is just a way to increase the dynamic range of the image. Alternatively you can use a neutral density filter.
I doubt it'll help. You have to use graduated filter in this case
It does work Mikhail. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v717/owenschmierer/Crookhaven%20Heads/DSC_3065.jpgThis was taken from bracketing two shots and then merging together... if I hadn't done this either the sky would be blown or the foreground would be too dark.
I think he meant you need a graduated neutral density filter? Or is that just a longer name for an ND filter?
-
pippin88
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Newcastle / Sydney
by Hlop on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:29 am
Aw, sorry, I meant neutral density filter won't help - it allows you to use lower shutter speed in a bright light situation but to solve a problem of blown sky you have to use graduated filter.
Blending of two images I'm using myself from time to time but I don't really like it
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by owen on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:31 am
awww man, and I did mean to say graduated ND filter rather than just ND... what can I say, it's Friday!
-
owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by Hlop on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:31 am
pippin88 wrote:I think he meant you need a graduated neutral density filter? Or is that just a longer name for an ND filter?
No, it's not a longer name, It's a half tinted half clear filter in a rough description. It might be ND, or color filter
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Hlop on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:32 am
owen wrote:awww man, and I did mean to say graduated ND filter rather than just ND... what can I say, it's Friday!
Communication breakdown
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Killakoala on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:46 am
A 'Graduated ND filter' and an 'ND filter' are two different things.
The Graduated filter is darker on one end and lightens towards the other end. It allows you to reduce the glare of the sky and keep the foreground exposed better.
I used a Graduated ND filter for the pano below. As you can see, the sky is exposed at about the same quantity as the foreground.
http://www.stevekilburn.com/stevekilbur ... 0Quay.html
An ND filter on the other hand is the same tone/darkness over the entire filter.
ND Filters usually come in values of +2, +4 or +8. The higher the number, the darker the filter.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-
Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by owen on Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:47 am
Killakoala wrote:A 'Graduated ND filter' and an 'ND filter' are two different things. The Graduated filter is darker on one end and lightens towards the other end. It allows you to reduce the glare of the sky and keep the foreground exposed better. I used a Graduated ND filter for the pano below. As you can see, the sky is exposed at about the same quantity as the foreground. http://www.stevekilburn.com/stevekilbur ... 0Quay.htmlAn ND filter on the other hand is the same tone/darkness over the entire filter. ND Filters usually come in values of +2, +4 or +8. The higher the number, the darker the filter.
Hey Mate.
What rating graduated ND filter did you use for that shot?
Cheers.
-
owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
Return to Tips and tricks
|