DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Deam sequence number 9Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Deam sequence number 9
Matt, I have looked at this a couple of times now, composition wise, works perfectly, i see what your doing with the intentional blur, but feel it needs to be pushed further..
just a thought on the PP.  gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Deam sequence number 9
I prefer the second version. It has an ethereal quality about it.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
