First Pano - Tall shipModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
First Pano - Tall shipMy first attempt at a pano. Taken during my tall ships sail. Not really very happy with this, but thought I'd post it anyway. I should have thought of the concept when the ship was a little larger I think
The larger version is at http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/gallery/433052/2/17612388/Large Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Stubbsy, if this is a stitched pano you've done very well, esp given the conditions you were taking it from! Impressed
The view of the heads from that angle is really quite impressive - gives a real feel for the height and rugedness (sp?). See what you mean, though, about it being a pity the ship wasn't bigger. Your shots from this unusual day out have been great - thanks. *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Peter,
It's nice pic and first successfully handholding pano from you. Thought shooting in portrait mode, the ship will be taller and bigger. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Mudder
This is the Bounty taken from the Svanen (which I was on). Both of us are heading IN to port, so the Bounty is in front of us. The wake is from a pleasure craft that was checking us out. Sheepie Stiched with Panorama Factory from 12 images Birddog. This was shot portrait mode (one of the things I had taken on board from other's posts), but I cropped it a little since the foreground was mostly water Everyone. Thanks for your comments. Next time I'll do better Edit: And taken hand held with 24-120 VR On and, stupidly, in Shutter Priority mode (1/3200) rather than manual. The aperture ranged from F/3.5 to F/7.1 Last edited by stubbsy on Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Well done Peter... In the words of the challenge... "Frame it and sell it"...
How many pics were stitched together??? Did you use Autostitch? With the quality of this and recent software advances, it really makes you wonder whether you need all these expensive tripods, heads, spirit levels etc... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
John 12 portrait images - used panorama Factory. Tried Autostich but couldn't get an image bigger then 84K out of it. Yeah - tripods etc. That's why I've gone with VR. Really paid off big time on the ships as without VR I'd have had lots of blurry shots. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Well done stubbsy, You escape from the 20 Lashes you were about to receive if you really stuffed it up.
Mic.
By the sound of it, you need to play with the scaling in the Options menu before loading in your pics... Edit-->Options-->Scale=100% or Edit-->Options-->Height == the height of your original images... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Peter i think it looks ok maybe if the ship was a bit further over in that sunlight might have changed it a bit, but still ok but i haven't dome many of these as i dont have key for my panorama factory so dont bother although i do like pano's.
Cheers John BBJ D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Very good for a first try.........when you have a bit more practice would love to read a how to do it post......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Pete, it's wonderful, I think the smaller ship size is very effective against the size of the cliffs. One to keep and treasure.
Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
I see and i like. The smaller ship size just adds to the remoteness of sailing the high seas.
Well done Peter. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|