Maltings MittagongModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Maltings MittagongWent to Bowral for the weekend. Before I went looked on the net for any interesting photo op.
Found this place, the malting at Mittagong. It closed in 1980's there is another building on the other side of the creek behind me and to the right. All the internal stairs have be removed and the building inside partly demolished. There were originally three building, all three over time caught fire now only two remain.
Re: Maltings MittagongGood stuff Tony. I imagine the local kids find this a great hangout...
If I could offer some thoughts for constructive critique: Photo 01: I like the composition but find the main subject (the building) doesn't have much contrast from the foreground - but has a huge contrast from the sky. I would be inclined to either darken the sky and/or darken the foreground, so your eye is led towards the main subject more (or perhaps just make the building brighter). I would also clone out the tree that looks to be growing from the rooftop on the RHS building. Photo 02: I would add lens correction to this to fix up the slight backwards tilt and the strong vertical lines. I really like that you can see part of the building through the windows - the one on the right looks a little overexposed. I wonder if that could be brought back a little in post-production? Also, did you capture an image just of the symbol? - that would look good also. Photo 03: Again I would add lens correction to fix the vertical lines. It is a shame the steps on the LHS are cut-off. I really like the thought process behind this image. Looks like you had a good time in any case. Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Re: Maltings MittagongI agree with the above. However, because the steps are cut off in the 3rd picture I would simply crop them out altogether to make the central subject more prominent.
Re: Maltings MittagongThis building is a great subject and looks very spooky on a dark, stormy day. You can't go past it without taking a photograph. I agree with the above comments in that they would improve the image somewhat, but still a great job.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Maltings MittagongI think a BW treatment could be excellent with the first two.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Maltings Mittagong
Over the hills ride or hops Oz to the rescue. Thanks for the comments Dave, much appreciated for the feedback 1 was shot early morning and I got north wrong, I should have been there in the afternoon. 2 A lot of shot were overexposed and I had pull it back bit but it was just to much. I did correct the verticals a bit. 3 Yer, I was focused on the horse.
Thats was the idea I had in mind, but it was either overcast or sunny and I just could not get a position I liked. All in all it was a bit of failure. I have some shots of the other building as well, which I put up.
Re: Maltings MittagongI prefer the second b&w to the colour version. It has more visual impact.
Re: Maltings MittagongBW works a treat especially with the vignette. Looks dark and foreboding.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|