Two for commentModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Two for commentI am interested on what people think of these? Like, dislike, yawn
Re: Two for commentI don't mind the image and find the silhouette of the trees quite interesting. Much prefer the colour version.
I like the play of the top half being cool and the lower half being warm - I'd be inclined to accentuate that even further. I also find the slight blown-out sun spot on the water distracting to the eye and would use the healing brush to fix that in Photoshop (along with straightening the horizon ) I took the liberty of doing a quick 60 second edit to show you what I saw (I hope you don't mind - if so please let me know and I will remove). Adjustments made were: - straighten horizon - adjust channel mixer (Blue channel, raised blues and lowered greens) - healing brush to improve bright sun spot on water Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Re: Two for commentThanks Dave.
Thanks for the feed back and the reworked version. It does give it a warmer feel. The horizon, did not see that for the trees
Re: Two for commentNo worries. It just gives you another point of view. We all see things in a different way - that's how I'd interpret the shot (no right or wrong, just different)
Sometimes it is hard reviewing your own work as you can get stuck focusing on one thing and completely overlook something else. Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Re: Two for commentI like the improvements made in the fourth version.
Re: Two for commentI like the second image best. The image is atmospheric, quite, tranquil....but how much better would it be if there was a white swan in the foreground? It seems to missing 1 element...swan, jumping trout, small boat..that would lift it to above excellent.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|