Opinions

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Opinions

Postby TonyT on Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:05 pm

Opinions Good, Bad, Ugly?

Image
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: Opinions

Postby Matt. K on Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:53 pm

The image has some lovely elements but lacks a focal point....something for the eye to lock onto. Perhaps something or somebody in the foreground would have provided this....IE a dog running in the sand or a piece of driftwood.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Opinions

Postby biggerry on Sun Aug 02, 2015 9:40 am

Matt has raised a good point about the focal point, however for me the image lacks continuity, the line of the water acts a nice lead however its sends the viewer out of the frame since its cutoff at both sides. The sun is a nice anchor point and more so for this BW however, it also sends the viewer crashing out the right hand side of the frame due to the fact its placed soo close to the edge.

In hindsight (bearing in mind I have never seen this spot) I would have considered a wider panoramic option, capturing the curve of the water on the left (as it leads around to the headland) such that the viewer could move from the bottom right to the left side then back across to the bright sun. The sun would also be better placed at the intersection of the top right hand side third. I think with the wider view you could get away without having a strong focal point ie log in the foreground.

HTH.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Opinions

Postby zafra52 on Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:20 pm

Bearing in mind what it has been said above, I believe the focal point is the sun. Bu, I agree that it needs something else.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Opinions

Postby TonyT on Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:15 pm

Matt. K wrote:The image has some lovely elements but lacks a focal point

Thanks Matt,

biggerry wrote:however for me the image lacks continuity

This was taken in 2006, at that time I was using the kit lens only. Thanks very helpful and I agree with then and the same with Matts comment.

zafra52 wrote: I believe the focal point is the sun. Bu, I agree that it needs something else

Thanks Zaf, your comments add weight to the previous comments.

The trouble with your own work its hard to see it sometimes for what it is. I have shown this to a couple of people and they have liked it, but I was not, at all sure about it. It good to get good feedback, so thanks.
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: Opinions

Postby ozimax on Thu Aug 06, 2015 4:26 pm

Matt. K wrote:The image has some lovely elements but lacks a focal point....something for the eye to lock onto. Perhaps something or somebody in the foreground would have provided this....IE a dog running in the sand or a piece of driftwood.


A shark?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron