Waterfalls todayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Waterfalls todayI took these photographs today at Garigal National Park to experiment with a slow shutterspeed, exposure and running water.
Well had some problems trying to keep stuff dry, tied an umbrella to my tripod to keep my gear dry, turned my back for a second and it took off and landed in deep water. Got it back though Micro trekker worked well, had to blowdry all of my equipment when I got home. Took a while to work out the right exposures on site. In PP just stuck to my staples, Levels, Brightness/contrast and Sat. Used adjustment layers for added control as there is both ends of the brightness scale. Pretty happy with the results however would appreciate your thoughts Regards Sean Sigma 18-50mm @ 50mm- F32-1/8sec-Spot metering-Manual setting Sigma 18-50mm @ 50mm- F25-1/6sec-Spot metering-Manual setting Nikon 28-80 @ 80mm- F36-1/4sec-Spot metering-Manual setting Sigma 18-50mm @ 24mm- F25-1/6sec-Spot metering-Manual setting Sigma 18-50mm @ 50mm- F25-1/6sec-Spot metering-Manual setting Nikon 28-80 @ 80mm- F10-1/100 sec-Spot metering-Shutter priority "The more I learn, the less I realise I know"
The images are very nice, Sean. That's something I've always wanted to try but have never gotten around to.
IMO just a little more PP will make them real winners. My suggestion would be regarding the yellow-brownish color cast in the water in several of the pictures. Neutralizing the yellow with levels adjustments, color balance, or some other method would make the water look more pure and the pictures more sparkling and beautiful. IMO just a little slower shutter speed would have also been even better, but I realize that that might have been impossible without a neutral density filter or a lens with an even smaller f/stop. Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Sean - 2 things come to mind: one, you are very game to go out in wet weather to take pics. Two, thank god you did - very good shots and I agree with Steve on the colour balancing.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
You might want to try desaturating just the Yellows in the image with Photoshop: Image>Adjustments>Hue/Saturation>Yellows and either desaturate or lighten the value. Again- just IMO.
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Sean
Your images are missing a bathing naked nymph. Excellent shots but I tend to agee that there is a touch of colour in the water that needs to be removed. Try this trick in PS....make a rectangular selection of part of the water and go to HUE/SATURATION. Now pump the saturation up until you can see a colour appear. Now go to COLOUR BALANCE and add some of the opposite colour. Let me know if that works for you. Regards
Matt. K
Darb
Well done! You are "colour" skilled! Which brings up an interesting fact that Japanese women who used to work in the pearling industy were much coveted by Pro Photo Labs because they had an extremely high sensitivity to colour. They were skilled at grading pearls and colour balancing photographs. Regards
Matt. K
some great shots there sean... well done.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Thankyou all for your comments, would you believe when I boosted the hue/sat I also orginally boosted the yellow seperately as I thought it made it look more natural.
After reading everyones advice I have updated the orginals from my site so the ones above should show my updates . Thanks SoCal Steve for kicking off the review your comments were spot on with the colour and have helped me heaps. You were right about the exposure points too, with that light I was at the limit, 200 iso - small apertures (got a bit mudled with the exposure comp) Thanks Matt K for your tip, I did try it out however I managed to do the job a bit easier this way, reduced the Yellow in Hue/sat on an adjustment layer more than I originally boosted. Then I had to paint the vegetation back to life, at this point I just removed the remaining yellow with the sponge tool. Darb thanks for working the image, It appeared that you had also sharpened the image. I ended up doing this to all the images and improved them IMO alot better. I remember having a thin glaze of mist on everything so sharpening repaired much of the image integrity loss. Thanks to Sirhc & Xeribus for your kind words too I will proberly go back there tomorrow as I am told there is a bigger water fall 400m down the track Regards Sean "The more I learn, the less I realise I know"
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|