Portrait of William, my NephewModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Portrait of William, my NephewOk for my 1000th post I decided to put up this portrait on smugmug.
No shooting info for it as yet as I'm in the process of doing other things. Was shot with the Kit Lens iirc. <img src="http://darryl.smugmug.com/photos/18004389-O.jpg"> Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Marcus, you're not a policeman are you? Then it would be a copper keeper kipper? If that was the case, would that be starting a copper keeper kipper caper? Better stop here or risk being thrown off the forum... Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Matt not as far as I know, unless white wedding curve does it. I opened up NCE, went to Curves and selected Load. Then changed filename to ANY the opened up pointandshoot.ntc (white wedding). Which I think made it look quite bright, so I think I did -1/4 to -1/2 EV and a USM.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Thanks Kipper
It's a lovely image but there seems to be something wrong with the skintones...it's as if an excessive levels or curves adjustment was made. The overall tonality just doesn't look right on my monitor. I think maybe you should reopen the RAW file and just check it side by side with the posted image. I am really interested in what might have happened here because I have seen it before on some of my own images when I have overdone the levels or the curves. Cheers! Regards
Matt. K
Yeah, I'm not sure but when I opened pointandshoot curve via NCE it sort of changed the skin tones and I thought it looked odd myself but then I started convincing myself it looked right. Let me post without. Actually just checked the PSD file in PS and it looks fine there but in IE totally different. In IE the skintones look too red, whereas in PS the skintone is more natural.
Ok just looked in Firefox and it displays the skintones the same. Tried PNG, same there it's wierd. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Ok this is interesting. I just read somewhere that to save to JPEG from Photoshop one should use Save for Web. Instead of the usual Save option. Never realised this, had used ImageReady in the past and this slices up PSDs and makes nice GIF/JPEG for webpages but never to convert a picture for the web.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|