Another "washed out" image from the house of MattyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Another "washed out" image from the house of MattyThis is a shot of my partner's rental/holiday house. The sun was at an approx 45 degree angle coming over my right shoulder and slightly diffused by light cloud at the time of exposure. The shot's details are :-
ISO 200 1/100th 18mm f/10 -0.3 EV Like yeaserday's shot this one has had no post shoot editing apart from a small boost in exposure in RAW(NEF) conversion. The image looks unreal to me, the same shot without CPL filter is the same wishy washy look. Does this look realistic to you? Shoot early - Shoot often
Matt K. I'm pleased you think this one is a good'un. I think my washed out worries might be a paranoid delusion on my part. Sometimes I just don't reconcile what I see versus what the camera records. perhaps it looks fine after all!!
I'll try the darkening advise and see what I get. I think I expect too much of my equipment. The more I look at this , the more I fail to see my fears expressed. Thanks for your valued comments. Shoot early - Shoot often
Great pix ......but when all the work was done in the darkroom both colour and B&W the only thing I would do is darken the sky a little on the left and right corners to make the building stand out a bit more .......A very well exposed original
big pix Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|