ok another waterfall decision please!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

ok another waterfall decision please!

Postby darb on Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:35 pm

Image


Image
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby beej on Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:46 pm

I quite like the second one. More of a vertical pano look and I love oversaturated images.

- beej
User avatar
beej
Member
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:49 pm

Darb

First one is better for me since, again, the second one looks unnatural. Maybe the trick is to make the greens darker, rather than more saturated and the water more purple?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby darb on Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:02 pm

how about ..

Image
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby Killakoala on Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:08 pm

If you could do what you did with the last one and add a bit more left and right then i reckon you'd have it spot on :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby leek on Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:17 pm

Sorry, but all of them look a little unnatural on my monitor... Not sure what you are trying to achieve :shock:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby darb on Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:20 pm

the first one is basically straight off the camera mate.

im trying to get a nice rich vibrant edit.
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:59 pm

Darb

I think the third one is getting much close like Killa said
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby darb on Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:12 pm

so comp wise you reckon a slightly wider crop ?
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:13 pm

darb wrote:so comp wise you reckon a slightly wider crop ?

Yep
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby darb on Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:20 pm

im sticking to a 12 x 4 aspect ratio so if i widen i also increase length ... the sky above the current crop is bright and ugly, so i guess i can put an extra couple hundred pixels of length along the bottom ... keeping the top where it is, if that looks unco tho im not sure
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby mic on Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:28 pm

Darb, I think the problem ( if you could call it that ) With being so long the bottom bit of the water looks likes itls been duplicated from the top or mirrored.
I think Crop it 3/4 the way down :?

Sorry, it might be he booze talking :roll:

Is there rules on this Forum for Drinking & Posting :roll: :roll:

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques