DaD, Thats Enough O.K.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
36 posts
• Page 1 of 1
DaD, Thats Enough O.K.My Daughter Morgan, Bathtime
17-55mm Nikkor Fat Boy / SB 800 Light Puncher. Mic. Hope you like as much as I do.
Nice pic mik, wait till she learns how to poke her tongue out as that is what i get everytime i point the camera at the kids, they hate when i try something new, so give it time mate it will happen. A little bit dark on her face but yes good capture with some bubbles as well.
Cheers John D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Hmm...not sure whats happening?Hi Mic,
When I view your pic on D70users its really dark. So I saved it and opened in PS to have another look. Well I got a totally different image? Probably what your seeing. I noticed the other day you posted a shot of a cliff and mentioned a purple background yet no one could see it (including me). There is something strange going on here. Because you have to post a pic here via pixspot I'm going to do a test and see what happens. ps...I still think you maybe one of those he/she persons! I know nutzinc
Great shot.
That's ultra sharp - what aperturewas that? Doesn't look wide open. Are her eyes really that deep a blue? They are quite striking. Have to agree with BBJ though, maybe a tad more exposure on the face, but I like the bubbles and water reflections. Planning to sell my primes for the 17-55 - your shots are just accelerating the process. Joolz
I'm TrippingMy PC just crashed and I've rebooted. I've come back to continue and now the pic looks totally different (great shot!).
Very strange. I'm either tripping or having a flashback! Beautiful child. I know nutzinc
No I'm not tripping. I thought it may have had something to do with me wearing beer goggles last night but I've just looked at it again this morning, and compared to when I save it and view it (with any application) the posted version is really dark. This is very strange. Any ideas?
This is a simulation but the difference is like this?? I know nutzinc
OK Mic - are you making changes on the fly
I had a look, scrolled down to see comments and thought yes Morgan is a little dark - scrolled up and the pic was lighter That aside, your daughter takes a wonderful pic and that lens is stunning BTW what is ProPhoto RGB That could be a reason for some pictures appearing different - I believe that most people would use the Adobe RGB colour space and I am not familiar with ProPhoto. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Hmmmm, No I'm not adjusting anything. Just posted as is last night.
Chris, Pro Photo is what my Printer has told me to set my Calibration to, but it asks me how I want to save the image and I do in adobe 1998 space when I post for Web stuff. Hmmm Macus you might be on to something I've been stuffing up ? I'll return tonight, I have to go to a family do now. Hmmm the plot thickens
Mic - grabbing your photo off the forum page to desktop then opening in PSCS it tells me that it is ProPhoto RGB
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Chris do you see what I mean when you open in PS? It's a totally different looking image. If so, we must get this sorted for Mic. regards Marcus I know nutzinc
I opened this in PSCS and yes, it is using the ProPhotoRGB colourspace.
The image looks much improved colour wise once viewed in a colourspace aware program. More accurate seeming and pleasing (to my eyes) skin tones. I think my problem (and that of most of us) is that our browsers are colourspace unaware. I use Opera 7 which doesn't do colour management & shows all images as if in sRGB (giving things a flat & slightly green tinged look). I don't think Internet Explorer does colour management either. Not sure of OSX browsers or firefox though. Might perhaps be prudent when saving for web to save in sRGB. I did a search & I found this issue dealt with already: http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php ... pace#41107 http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php ... highlight= In any case - the image is even better than I thought it was. Joolz
Yes Marcus - totally different Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Opened Mic’s pic in PSCS and converted to Adobe RGB. The levels were way out so did adjustment and saved AS ADOBE RGB as I always do and here is the result:
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Whoops! Too slow.
Sorry for the unnecessary repeat in sRGB - though there is still a noticable difference between aRGB & sRGB on web browsers (mine was not exposure corrected). Very noticable difference from PRoPhotoRGB. I also have an untouched AdobeRGB up to compare the difference if you want to see: http://www.pixspot.com/albums/userpics/Morgan-3.jpg Joolz
O.K. Here we go,
Chris are you out there ? As I said earlier I have set up my setting for Pro Photo for when I print as this is what the Printers use. Now, when I open up a NEF File it comes up in the bottom left hand corner Adobe RGB 1998 When I hit o.k. it comes up with another message box saying which working space do you want to use RGB 1998 or Pro Photo Now I've tried Pro Photo before but when I upload to my Web Page and copy to embed in our Forum it won't work So this is why I choose RGB 1998 because it worked no worries. Now that Image that you adjusted is pretty close to what I see on my Mac Screen, just a tad darker on mine. Not by much. Any Ideas ? Mic.
This is a difficult one Mic. As you may be aware I work on a Mac as well. After dragging your photo from here to my desktop and doing an open in PSCS it told me the working space of your image was ProPhoto RGB and would I like to convert to my working space which is Adobe RGB and I said yes. After looking at the levels in your pic I noticed that there was a lot of the right hand side missing. I dragged the highlight slider to meet the histogram and then just saved as an Adobe RGB jpg and posted up. From what you have said above you use Adobe RGB to embed images but they are showing as ProPhoto RGB so I am mystified. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
O.K, this is a test I just did from a NEF It said RGB 1998
I have adjusted the brightness a fair bit so it look really bright on my screen but not over bearing. How does this look ?
O.K that did it
I'm a Bamboozled beyond belief I'll try my daughter from scratch again and see how we go. Allow a few Mins. Thanks Chris. Mic.
O.K. Chris, Here Goes.
I adjusted Brightenss thats all, so it look like the one you sent through earlier today.
Mic - I pulled your latest pic off and opened in PSCS alongside the one I posted earlier.
A little test: your pic still looks a bit more dull than mine so I took some readings off a reference point - the tip of your daughters nose Your pic: R=171 G=125 B=89 My copy: R=242 G=180 B=141 There appears to be more saturation in my copy and the only thing I adjusted was levels. Question: does my pic look brighter on your monitor than the one you have just posted? Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Sorry Chris, there must be an easier way to do this
The one I just sent through, does that look better than the original one I did ? Or is it still too dark or lacks something ? Mic.
Mic,
she is right here in front of me !!! I guess you have the towel ready. She could be in my bathroom !!! Wow, what a photo !!! Great photo !!! Cheers and happy Easter CD
Mic - It certainly looks a lot better than the first post but it lacks a bit of punch, if you know what I mean.
I have decided to give up photography and computers and become a monk Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Hi Sirch55,
whom are you donating your camera gear to after becoming a monk ?! Please put me on top of your list. Cheers and happy Easter CD
Thanks CD At least yours looks good
Chris, What have I opened up here Is it me, Is it you, Is it everybody else HHeeellllllllllllllllllllpppppppppp !!!! I might join you, Monks sound like a lot less stress. I'm off to have a Pizza, I'll check back later. Sorry for wrecking your night. Mic & his can of Worms.
Hi Mic,
I hope I did'nt cause you too much grief!! It's just that when I saved and opened your shot of Morgan I could'nt believe the difference between the posted image and what I was looking at (in PS or ACDC or even the default XP browser..I've forgotten what it's called) . I had seen an earlier post of yours where people were saying they could'nt see the purple that you could see (or something like that) and I remembered that and thought hang on, there's something wrong here. I thought your shot was too good to to be posted the way it looked on D70users, as opposed to what I could see, so I asked the question. kind regards Marcus..........................ps To me you'll always be a woman! I know nutzinc
Marcus,
Go back a few in this Thread and have a look at the Rose. How does that look & the new one of Morgan. Because apparently they are pretty close to the Mark ? Mic, sitting here with a dress on
Mic.....glad to hear your dressed for the occasion!
Yeah, all is good. Rose is sensational and Morgan now looks like I saw her in PS. Maybe repost your cliff shot the same way? I'd like to see it. I know nutzinc
Thanks Marcus,
Thats just great, now you can claim starting 2 Threads that went Ballistic. I've only adjusted some brightness You've caused me angst thinking I have been posting something from Mars & Chris to go and become a Monk & me giving him a headache. Well done. Whats next from my fine feathered Martian Mic.
Thanks joolz for your input
I think I have it right now, I THINK, until someone else comes along and says Hey, your images look strange & dark ?? Mic.
Previous topic • Next topic
36 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|