"hands of time"

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

"hands of time"

Postby darb on Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:31 am

ok was a tad idle tonight so decided to try something different. A few Nef's... nothing too special i dont think, just a bit of stuffing around.

Placed my watch on the desk and did some long exposures.

The watch was naturally resting on its side, some i have rotated , some havent. What do you think looks OK exposure wise, and then which orientation do you prefer?

Apart from the 30 second shot, i opened my study door and turned on a hallway light for about 45 seconds to add a bit of ambient light.

The first two were a bit tricky, had to flick the watch to "tme" whilst being on london time so the hands would swing around, then off the lights, focus and click the bulb release. (its the same image, with two orientations.)


"hands of time" 2m30s. (watch hands fast forwarding to london time position for effect.)
Image


"hands of time" 2m30s. (watch hands fast forwarding to london time position for effect.)
Image


"hands of time" - 3 minute exposure
Image


"hands of time" - 2 minute exposure
Image


"hands of time" - 30 second exposure.
Image
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby leek on Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:19 am

Some interesting shots Brad... It's fun / good to experiment...

I really like the first couple and probably prefer the portrait orientation.

Is that your computer monitor reflecting in the first couple of shots (blue light at about 5 o'oclock on the watch)?

The only thing I could think of improving would be to make the surface that the watch is resting on less visible... You could maybe do this by sitting the watch up vertically and cropping out some of the strap... I think clear space (or boke) to the left and right of the watch face would help the shot...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:47 am

Interesting shots, darb. Like Leek, I prefer the portrait orientation. The blur of the hands is quite suggestive of time flying, which I assume is what you wanted. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:58 am

Shot #2 is possibly the best, and has been said before the removal of the ”stuff” on the left would improve the shot.

I do like very much the last shot - the darkness of time, my only suggestion would be to clone out the reflection of the hour dots.

Very nice
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Manta on Thu Mar 31, 2005 11:13 am

#2 does it for me too Darb, minus the blue reflection. I also think I'd prefer it straight on, rather than slightly turned to the right. Maybe try mounting it on a stick or something. Maybe a perspective adjustment in PS?
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby -=Monty=- on Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:07 pm

How did you have the shuttert open for 3 mins?

I thought that you had to have your finger on the button the whole time when using BULB?
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby stormygirl on Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:10 pm

I'm going to be different and say I like the first one the best! Why? I'm not so sure! But the second in portrait, just doesn't look quite right IMHO!

Very nice shots, though, and an interesting experiment. I only wish I had time to do this kind of thing!

Nice watch too!
User avatar
stormygirl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby darb on Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:40 pm

did the bulb using Nikon infra red remote and just timed it with a stop watch (no not the one i was photographing, heh.) ... one press starts the shot, another press finishes it. (then you wait for the NR to complete.) ... so just watched tv in another room while the shots were going through.

Yeah the blue was a bit of a shame, i can clone that out i guess.

as for the other tips and answers, all taken onboard ... if i get time / patience i'll go do things such as darken the desk etc that it sits on.
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques