Look at this Rock!!! RAW RULESModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Look at this Rock!!! RAW RULESHere's the next pic I took in Raw. I must say that working in 16 bit is very helpful. I LOVE the detail I got out of the rock on the bottom. I also really like how the rocks descend into the water and fade into the silky lightness of the water. I also love the power line poles on the top right...and the little cloud...the more I write the more I like! I find I'm converting to BW more and more these days for some reason. I should probably clone out the branches on the right hand side though EH?
(I can't believe how much I love that rock!)
Looks like you have got raw nailed.......
Cheers Big Pix Love the rock and the branches in the wires........ mystery and intrigue Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Dooda....... I have just looked at your web site........ If it is a sample of where you live, evey where you point a camera there is a great image.....
good one Big Pix Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Thankyou Big Pix. Indeed Squamish is truly a majestic place, and Vancouver is great as well (I'm actually thinking about trying my hand at urban photog). I find that the challenging thing is getting the pictures in interesting ways that no one else has gotten, or relaying the small micro world that makes it so beautiful here.
Mic, indeed you have created a monster. I haven't been this excited in a long time. Shooting in JPEG creates massive noise amounts and banding in skies etc where Raw is much cleaner. I didn't notice PP being any slower as well.
I'll work my way from Pigeon Park to Stanly Park at say 2am on thursday eve. That should be interesting.
Actually there is a little old downtown in Squamish that I work in and it is about to be redeveloped. there are tons of old Squamishites that live there right now, people where you can really see their hard lives worn on their face. They look interesting, they have big dogs, walk around slowly with seemingly nothing to do etc. I want to capture them before all the condos go up and it becomes a bedroom community for Vancouver.
Dave - one of the first rules of photography is to love what you take. This pic shows the growing empathy you have obtained with nature and design. A beautiful photo, and I agree about the power lines.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
It took me a while to realise what I was looking at here... Mainly coz I first looked on my really crappy Acer monitor at work...
Now that I'm on the slightly less crappy Dell monitor at home I can see the wonderful detail in the bottom half of the pic... Nice shot dooda... I'm glad you have discovered RAW... I made the switch a few weeks ago, but unfortunately I haven't noticed such a dramatic improvement in my shots yet... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Here is the JPEG. It doesn't look so bad in color, but as soon as I convert to BW through channels I get this really grainy effect in the tonal range.
That's why I'm so stoked about RAW, no grainy blotchiness. (EDIT)BTW, this is the same scene but not the same pic. I took this pic before, then remembered that I wanted to try Raw, ran back and took the Raw pic (thank goodness).
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|