Apolo bay. After stormModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Apolo bay. After stormWhat do you guys think? This was after the big storm that flooded Geelong back in december last year. EDIT: Here is a better picture: Last edited by -=Monty=- on Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
Monty,
What sort of PP have you employed in this? As Glen says, it looks a bit underexposed or dark; I'd like to see this worked on a little more to bring out some more of the shadow detail, but while still keeping the wonderful moody, stormy feel that you've captured. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Lovely shot Monty - although I agree to a certain extent with Glen and Gary I would tend to crop the bottom out to make it more of a panorama look and just a tad of lightning up
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Great photo, Monty. I'd actually have to agree with everyone else here!
As I was looking at it, and before I read the other posts, my initial thought was that it is a little dark, particually in the foreground, then I thought cropping would be good EXACTLY as Chris has said. Go with a more panoramic feel to it, and lighten it and you will improve an already fabulous shot! If I knew how to do it, I'd have a go to show you what I mean....but I don't! Well done, and love that sky!
I love stormy skies, especially over water (for some strange reason ), I think Chris had a good idea, crop the extreme top and some of the lower foreground, bring up some of the shadow detail especially on the shore and town details and it'd be a pearler...
Cheers.. Aka Andrew
Slight adjustments to shadows and midtones to bring out more detail. Colors are a bit unnatural after the adjustment as I brought the greens and blues up. However I feel it gives it more of a painted feel. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Sorry kipper but I think you have gone too far and lost the asthetic appeal of the original IMO
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
yes... use the curve of the beach to frame the shot, ie crop just under where the beach leaves the RHS
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Not sure what it is, but the darkness of the photo doesn't do it for me. I'm all for dark photos but not this time
Did you use a filter of some sort or pp in p/shop to get the brown clouds or were they just that colour as it looks like you used one of those champagne gradient filters. IMHO, crop it and lose the wooden beams in the foreground and bring out brightness a bit more. Could be interesting as a B&W or B&W with a few colours left in for effect.
Monty - if you are 13 as you say I must say that in the years to come you will produce some amazing pics.
Your second pic has a better light balance IMO but the people spoil the isolationist effect of the first. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
The one without the people doesn't work nicely as a pano.
But here is an improved version of it: And yes, i really am 13 (turning 14 end of may) D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
I think it's great. I love the 'oil painting' style of look it has.
Well done Monty. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Sorry, Chris. The last picture by Monty is what about how I had it at work. Hence why I said it looks like a painted picture. However my monitor isn't calibrated as well as my home monitor, also Adobe colorspaces aren't setup properly. I'm looking at what I did at work from my home PC and I'm like "urgh, just looks like a normal photo of a beach".
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Monty - the last photo posted is just beautiful - I feel no need to critique this as you have done a wonderful job
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
WOW Monty... this is fantastic! I LOVE the colours! So you really are 13? You have a wonderful talent for someone so young. Enjoy it....you have your whole life ahead of you to do so! Brilliant picture! Wish I could've done that when I was 13!!
I must say it is very cool to have a 13 yr old on the forum.
You pretty much have this pic dialed. The lighter look brings out the color better. There are just a few details, I hope you don't mind. There is a vignette in the bottom right hand corner that is just slightly distracting. I generally try and clone those out. Also, there is a line where you selected the hills on the right side between the hills and the clouds. I don't even know how you get rid of that, but I'm pretty sure someone here knows how. Might have to do with feathering the pixels, or might selecting quick mask, then selecting the area and adding a gausion blur or something. Anyways I look forward to hearing how you blend that line in.
You are very good. I wish I had started at 13 with your talent. You will definitly go far. The line on the hills is gone, what did you do to get rid of it? I just remembered what I used to do was clone it out. Is that what you did here? You did a good job.
Well, i selected the sky and not the ground with the magic wand then clicked on invert selection and then used the paintbrush that was set to darken and hardness 0 to darken the right hand area a tiny bit. Also the opacity was like 4%. It took a while to get it to look nice. The only problem i personally have with this photo is the noise in the large file. It was taken at ISO 600 or somthing. BTW, thanks for all the replies and advice. D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|