Young WhistlerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Young Whistler85mm f/1.8 @ 1/125 & f/2.2 SB800 on remote bounced off a wall. Some PP in PS. Comments & critiques welcome. Joolz
Great tones, and sharpness and lighting. This is a really good picture. The hands in the mouth make it look interesting. That really is some lens. I sort of wish I could see a little detail in the hair, as well as some catchlight in the left eye. Otherwise it's perfect. Great job.
Great shot and personal treasure. Nice tones. Always hard to judge on our individual monitors, but t's just about right on mine.
I don't think I would change a thing except for the eye on the right side of the image, which looks like it might be hiding some useful detail that could be brought out with some careful PP work (hopefully it was shot in RAW). It might also be possible to fake a convincing catchlight for that eye using some manipulation or transform of the one on the opposite eye. Either way, that one's a keepsake. Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Thanks for the comments.
Thanks for pointing out the catchlight & hair. Now I realise why the shot was NQR. Sometimes don't see it after staring at a pic for too long. Need fresh pair of eyes to look. I guess that's the advantage of this great forum. I think I was a little too heavy handed on the curves. I've gone back to correct it & yes, Steve it was in RAW & edited as a layered TIF so correcting is a breeze. (Gotta love layers). Joolz
Joolz,
This is a very nice shot indeed, you should be very happy with this one. What process did you use to get it to this stage ? Wel done. Mic.
joolz, this is absolutely spectacular! What more can I say?? Just gorgeous! Well Done! Love the composition, lighting and PP......magnificent!
Great photo indeed.
What part of the image did you focus onto ? The reason I'm asking is that I feel that the hand is slightly more in focus than the face. This may be my perception or you may have done deliberatly so. I'm just curious. Also I like the fact that this image is some BW but not sepia, it is ??? Cheers CD
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|