Some Macro images from today's Sydney mini-meet

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some Macro images from today's Sydney mini-meet

Postby leek on Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:22 pm

...
Last edited by leek on Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sheepie on Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:59 pm

Who had the M&M's? I didn't see any!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:55 pm

Nice lens John :wink:

I can see you going macro you have a natural talent :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby leek on Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:12 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Nice lens John :wink:


Which one???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby mudder on Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:02 pm

The third image is interesting in that you can almost see where the "focal plane(?)" starts and stops in the bottom of the image... Or is it just me??? Dunno if I've used the right term there...

The second is drool material...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby leek on Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:05 pm

sheepie wrote:Who had the M&M's? I didn't see any!


We ate them all before you arrived... :lol:

Hey Glen, Can you post the M&M photo that you took with the Nikon for comparison...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby christiand on Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:36 pm

Hi,

it looks to me that the bokeh on the Nikon 200mm f4
on the photo of the D2X is a bit rough ?
The lens itself is sharp as and it gives some working distance etc etc.
Was it this particular shot of the D2X ?
What were the more detailed circumstances of that photo ?

Thanks

CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby leek on Sat Apr 02, 2005 10:33 pm

christiand wrote:Hi,

it looks to me that the bokeh on the Nikon 200mm f4
on the photo of the D2X is a bit rough ?
The lens itself is sharp as and it gives some working distance etc etc.
Was it this particular shot of the D2X ?
What were the more detailed circumstances of that photo ?

Thanks

CD


It's probably that particular shot Christian... The purple boke that you see in the background is the bubble wrap that BD puts on his table to protect the lenses and other gadgets... Probably not a good representation of the Nikon 200's boke :lol:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques