Leveled Rose

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Leveled Rose

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 1:23 am

This is my Rose shot where I adjusted the Levels to remove the Background so much it just about jumps out at ya :shock:

Well I think it looks alright, what about you ?

Image
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby coolbeer6 on Sun Apr 03, 2005 1:33 am

hi mic , im not normaly ane for flowers but i like the way the rose come out of the pic 3D like ..
nice pic
User avatar
coolbeer6
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby big pix on Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:58 am

I like what you have done.........but maybe a slightly tighter crop so the flower stands out more and to get rid of some background

big pix
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Manta on Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:14 am

Excellent shot Mic. I like how you've just kept those highlights in check without them blowing. Terrific colour as well. I agree with Big Pix, though - a tighter crop would be my preference.

I'm curious - using Levels to take out the background? Was it a very dark background to start with and you just made it darker or is there something else I'm missing here?
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby -=Monty=- on Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:47 am

Yes, please tell us how you removed the background. Did you use channels? and if so , how.

Fantastic photo though. I agree with the tighter crop too.
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby Manta on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:02 am

You're 13 Monty?!! Gee I wish I had a toy like a D70 when I was that age! You're one lucky dude. :wink:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby birddog114 on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:08 am

Monty,
Lucky boy you're!, i remebered when I was at your age, the best toy I can afford was, the empty sardine tins which I used as a car drawn by a string with 4 beer's bottle caps as its wheel, and all my guns were bamboo or tree branches which I played combat game with my friends.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Manta on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:13 am

Birddog114 wrote:Monty,
Lucky boy you're!, i remebered when I was at your age, the best toy I can afford was, the empty sardine tins which I used as a car drawn by a string with 4 beer's bottle caps as its wheel, and all my guns were bamboo or tree branches which I played combat game with my friends.


There's a snapshot of history, Monty. Society has come a long way. I'm sure you realise how lucky you are to have such luxuries.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:33 am

O.K. Boys here you go.

I cropped / adjusted levels ( left channel to around half way to the right )
( Right channel a tad to the left )

I also put a cooling filtet on 30% to calm the colour a bit.

Thats it :D

I have also included original if you want to play with to see what happens when you just adjust the Levels.

Glad you liked.

Mic. :wink:

Image
Image
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby kipper on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:42 am

It's funny what you can do with flowers isn't it Mic :)
I was playing around with a shot that I took of a flower yesterday and just adjusted the hues/saturation/lightness in various channels. I turned a red flower into an orange and purple one with vibrant green folage. Btw, how come you didn't use the extract tool (think it might be a Photshop CS thing, don't remember it pre CS).
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:47 am

Yes Kipper it is,

Some flowers work, some don't.

I'm just getting used to the Extract Tool, but just happen to try this and it looked much better.
I have to work on my Extractions.

Mic. :D :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby kipper on Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:04 am

Yeah I had a quick play around with it yesterday and sort of managed a rough extraction but had some issues around the edge.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:01 pm

Yes, I am finding with Extraction you have to be very carefull with the initial traceing otherwise it can look pretty crappy and fake ( which it is I suppose ) but you know what I mean.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby big pix on Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:06 pm

Mic ......the re-crop works a treat...... but I also like the soft colour of the original, should try a crop on that as well........good work

big pix
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby KerryPierce on Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:06 pm

You prolly don't want to hear this, but I like the original the best.... :shock:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:11 pm

Thanks BP, :wink: Yeah, I do too, but I like how the background just dissapeared completely on this one.

Kerry, yes you are right :cry: I don't won't to hear that :x
But Hey, this is what Critiques is all about.

I personally think it's the best flower I've done ( so to speak :? )

Cheers,

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby Mark T on Sun Apr 03, 2005 4:19 pm

OK, I'm going to go a little against the grain here, but I think the reds in the original have been overexposed.

When photographing a scene with primarily red (or blue) the auto exposure will overexpose for that colour. It has something to do with the RGB filter built into the CCD (25% red + 50% green + 25% blue). Accordingly, if you don't want the reds blown out, you must dial in some -ve EV.

If you open the original flower and check the levels in the red channel (Photoshop - Image -> Adjustments -> Channel: Red), you will see what I mean. Alternatively, look directly at the red channel in the Channels palete.

What this all means, is that you really don't have a lot of red information in the rose to play with. Consequently, in the PP'd image, instead of seeing detail of the petals in the centre of the rose, all I see are areas of red with all the detail lost.
User avatar
Mark T
Member
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby mudder on Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:15 pm

Just goes to show how differently everyone sees the same pic, I much prefer the original with softer colouring, maybe that softer (peachy colour?) one with the black background in a portrait orientation?

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby mic on Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:52 pm

Mark T, Thanks for your detailed Critique. I'll take your word for it :wink:

Thanks mudder :wink: Yes it is, just shows you how everybody likes or dislikes an image

I personally like the very 1st without the Crop, I love hte blackness around it.

Each to their own.

Cheers,

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques