A couple more shots from my unknown Hyde Park Wedding...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A couple more shots from my unknown Hyde Park Wedding...No trick photography this time unlike in this thread...
Just another couple of photos from my unofficial candid wedding shoot in Hyde Park on Sunday... Daughter: I wonder if it's too late to get this ring off... Mother: I wonder how I can best use the available light to get some half decent photos??? And here's one that the happy couple might actually have paid for (if only I knew who they were...) Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Nice candid shots,
You managed to capture some nice soft ambient light hitting the bride's face on the top shot without blowing highlights too much - v. hard to do in that uneven light. The second shot I like even more. Great expression - catching them looking at each other. The (sunset?) backlit veil you captured, adds warmth to the image even more. They definitely would have paid for that one. Joolz
I especially liked the second one. Great lighting, exposure, and DoF. Awesome timing to capture the expression just right.
are you stalking brides?
Paparatzi practise? New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
These are very good ......... you will have to come out of the closet ...... people are starting to look at the thing pokeing out.......
bp Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Thanks for the comments guys... No not stalking... I was just taking some shots in the park and the wedding party turned up... I can never resist a good wedding party - free models!!!
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
These a good practise Leek,
The first one looks like the Bride might of let off ( Nerves you know ) and the other lady is on to it The 2nd is really nice, maybe a tighter Crop. Keep Stalking those parks. Mic.
hahahhaa, I was capturing a wedding on the 26th March at the botanical gardens...saw 2 guys, one with a D70 T-shirt on, must be a member here??
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|