Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by Alex on Tue Apr 05, 2005 11:51 pm
Is it possible to get rid of the destructing white and red background bits in the lower left part of this photo using PS CS?
What steps in PS would be needed?
Thanks in advance.
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by phillipb on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:30 am
Hi Alex,
There are probably many ways of doing it.
I reduced the saturation of the image then used the history brush to restore colour to the face, hat etc.
But you would need to spend a fair bit of time to restore the colour around the hair where the red shirt is to do a good job.
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-
phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by sirhc55 on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:37 am
Now that Phillip has done his part all you need to do further is clone out the white patch.
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-
sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:40 am
Thanks Philip! This is great!
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:52 am
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:53 am
oops forgot the white part
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:00 am
Vince! This is unbelievable. How was this done, please please please??
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:04 am
Hi Alex,
Same as phillipb, completely desaturate, and use history brush to retore area. Also burn the hair abit on both sides, so do hide the red colour behind hair and finally add some blur to image, to smooth face.
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:19 am
Thanks a lot guys! I think I'm finally getting it right. I selectively desaturated the red area.
Cheers
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by Hlop on Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:35 am
shutterbug wrote:Hi Alex, ... and finally add some blur to image, to smooth face.
Hi Vince,
This part is interesting - I did some experiments but didn't get good results. Correct me if I'm wrong - you're copying layer, blur it and then erasing averything except skin, aren't you? What blur are you applying usually?
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:49 am
Used Gaussian Blur on new layer, just erase eye and mouth
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:52 am
I did a simple blur with 1.0 pix radius which gave a hardly noticable result. I didn't really aim for the 'model' look so it was not that important. But in Scott Kelby book, he uses a duplicate layer to give a blur of 3-6 pix radius and then use history brush to go back to the original 'sharp' eyes, lips, and other non-skin elements. But in my case, because the blur was so insignifican I saw no difference in softness of eyes or lips between the original or the image after the gaussian blur. Does this make sense?
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:55 am
Vince,
Your Gaussian blur gives amazing results, I must say, if one is after that 'mode' look. What radius did you use for blur?
Thanks
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by Hlop on Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:13 am
shutterbug wrote:Used Gaussian Blur on new layer, just erase eye and mouth
Thanks Vince!
What is the amount of blur(radius) you're using usualy?
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:27 am
Usually it depends on the image, around radius 10. Also I burn/dodge around image.
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by Hlop on Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:43 am
shutterbug wrote:Usually it depends on the image, around radius 10. Also I burn/dodge around image.
Aw... 10 ... Isn't it too much? Are you lowering layer's opacity?
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:02 pm
Yes, 10 seems like an awful lot but if that's the case, the results are worth it.
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by dooda on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:05 pm
If you wanted to fix it up even more, you could try whitening the teeth slightly. If it's someone you know, they may appreciate it. Pretty good shot though if I may say so.
-
dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:07 pm
oh, that was in general around radius 10. For the above image I think it was radius 6.
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by shutterbug on Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:08 pm
What I also do sometime is, have a high radius and use history brush set at 30% and delete some off.
-
shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:00 pm
dooda wrote:If you wanted to fix it up even more, you could try whitening the teeth slightly. If it's someone you know, they may appreciate it. Pretty good shot though if I may say so.
Thanks, mate.
I wasn't really aiming for glamour look as it was supposed to be a snap shot of a model after the show. I just wanted to remove the annoying background. However, I'm glad the thread took off in the direction it has because I learnt some new techniques as a result.
Cheers
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by Hlop on Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:06 pm
Tried to do the same thing - result is crap! It's clearly visible that image has been blured but radius was just 5 What's been done wrong?
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Alex on Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:55 pm
Looks pretty good to me, Mikhail. The only destracting thing I find with the image is I think you could used eraser to bring back the original hair sharpness on the left hand side.'
Cheers
Alex
-
Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by pippin88 on Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:12 pm
I think her nose line has been overly softened, and maybe the right edge of her face? Try lightly history brushing some sharpness back in along those lines?
-
pippin88
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Newcastle / Sydney
by Hlop on Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:53 pm
Pippin88,
I think you can achive the same result just erasing top blurred layer but it looks even more ugly. Just wondering how shutterbug softened the skin but kept all the lines sharp ....
Alex,
I wodn't say it's pretty good. Very average result. Not too bad but far from perfect
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-
Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
Return to Absolute Beginners Questions
|