does this work?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
does this work?hey guys, this is inspired by another picture involing a series of candles, i cant remember who the original poster was and i am too lazy to search atm.
do you guys think this picture works, im not sure myself, i love the idea of it just not sure if it worked or not. larger pic available at http://www.jamesthomson.net/albums/userpics/10001/DSC_3695.jpg cheers[/url] http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
Hi Thommo - I think I'd rather see more in focus, or none of them in focus. Having just the one is a little distracting, and I think lessons the appeal of the shot.
Other than that, perhaps a little too dark - would like to see some of the candles, not just the flame. *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Thommo,
I like it, but perhaps a stop or two less exposure might help where the highlights have been blown out? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thommo, I agree with Sheepie. The original poster was Geoff in this thread http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=4454
Interesating; I'm suggesting less exposure, while you're suggesting more. For the effect that you want to see, I think he needs to reduce the contast range by adding more light and then re-metering. I guess we're both saying that the exposure needs more attention, even though we're coming to that conclusion from totally different perspectives. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
thanks for the advice guys, the main reason i didnt want the candles to be viewable is because they are really cheap dinnerlight ones taht look very bad, but thanks for all the advice, i might have another go tonight if i get some time from uniwork.
http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
I was inspired by Geoff's candle pic too, but instead took pics of my daughter and some still life in the bathroom!!
Very nice attempt, Thommo, maybe a little more DOF and focus on the first candle? Just my thoughts! I like it, though, and will try something similar!
My suggestion would be to make the candle that is in focus another colour so that it does show a focal point.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Great idea! I have been struggling with exactly how I would approach this one, and this seems a good way to deal with it. My main issue with the depth of field was that the one candle in focus looked odd. By exagerating this, and making the one candle an obvious point of reference (with the extra colour) I think would work Give it a go Thommo - would be interested to see how it looks *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Hi Thommo,
my suggestion would be: less candles, perhaps three (?!!?, don't know where I got that from ...) more defined area of focus (I guess center candle if three) and very controlled exposure (perhaps do the same shot several times with different exposures to find the ONE ...) my 2 cents CD P.S. have a nice trip
Thats why you are the graphic designer New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Re: does this work?
Hi Thommo, I'm glad my candle shot inspired you . I like your shot but I'd like to see more candles in focus - I have some more ideas involving candles but if I tell anyone at this stage I'd have to kill you, and I don't think they'd let me have net access to get to the forums from jail . Well done though, nice image!
Re: does this work?
I hear hot wax is good for the senses *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|