Dead Tree

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Dead Tree

Postby meicw on Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:52 pm

Here is a pic that the people at work seem to like (unless they are being kind.)
What do you guys think?
Taken with the infamous Tamron 28-300 Di.

Regards
Meicw
Image
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby W00DY on Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:14 pm

Hi Meicw,

It is a good image but I think maybe it was shot at the wrong time of day (you can't always avoid this though).

You have framed it well and the little bit of cloud breaks up the sky a bit...

I just can't help wondering what it would have looked like later (or earlier) in the day.

Cheers,

W00DY
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby Aussie Dave on Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:22 pm

Hi meicw
I tend to agree that it may have looked better if shot in a different part of the day - however the tree has such great character, I still think this is a very good pic.

Did you do any PP on it ??
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Killakoala on Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:29 pm

Great subject but as the others said, it's lacking a bit of interesting lighting. I reckon it would look good as a series of shots showing morning, afternoon and evening. This would be a good subject to try out other landscape techniques too. I'd love to see more. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby mudder on Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:45 pm

G'day Mic,
As others have suggested try either early morning or late in the day to get some nice long shadows...
Terrific shot though, great subject and good framing, I really like old scraggly trees with their dead branches reaching out in vain... Interesting foreground too... I like it :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby PiroStitch on Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:37 pm

When all else fails, photoshop it ;)

Not sure if it's because of the sky but as I look towards the top of the tree, it starts to become unfocussed
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby meicw on Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:04 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. I will take some more in the morning and the evening as suggested.

Regards
Meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby kipper on Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:35 pm

Setup the camera on a tripod. Take a deckchair and a good book and some shade and an esky. Take a shot at morning, lunchtime and evening :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby meicw on Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:05 pm

OK, here is one of the same tree that I took this morning at 0845. My preference is for the first one. I will see if I can take another one about 5-ish this afternoon, if the change with rain hasn't come through.
Here is also another pic of a footbridge on the path going to Latrobe Uni. BTW the only PP done is tweaking of the levels and the removal of a power pole in the bridge pic. Taken with the Tamron 28-300 Di.

Regards
Meicw

Image
Image
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby SoCal Steve on Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:13 pm

Meicw- I'll leave the detailed analysis to someone else. I'll just say that I like it much better already! The tree is more dramatic and interesting than the first posting. The water fowl help the image too. :wink:
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques