Submarine at Stoney PointModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Submarine at Stoney PointI set off early this morning to catch a sunrise (5.40am) and I knew it was going to take me about 50-60minutes to get to my destination. I managed to get there as the big ball of fire was about to come over the horizon. This one was taken with it below the horizon and I've got about another 2 that have the sun in the frame. Now the question big question is. Do you think I should try and remove the blown highlight that the sun is causing in the middle or does it add to the scene?
ISO: 640 (accidently left it there from lastnight) Metering: Matrix Shutter: 1/50 Apperture: F/8 Focal Length: 18mm WB: Auto Lens: 18-70MM DX Filter: CPL Adjust levels, contrast. Also used shadow/highlight to bring out some of the shadow detail in the foreground. Then applied a velvia action. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Wow. Wow. Err.....Wow.
Stunning stuff Darryl. Well worth the early rise. I'm in two minds about the highlight and would like to see how your remedial efforts turn out before passing judgement. In a sinister twist, it could be rather reminiscent of a Cold War "accident". Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Darryl
Excellent shot, but I'd try to fix the blown highlight (but only a little) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Looks like a scene from Neville Shute's, 'On The Beach'. Appropriately taken near Melbourne too.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Blown highlight is fine and like Killa it reminds me of ”On the Beach” - I wonder how it would look in B&W
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Yeah, this was just a quick pano. I think I'll have to spend some time with it to get a good result. The horizon is slightly out of whack on most of the shots. Not sure what happened as I levelled the tripod and thought the horizon looked fairly level with the grid lines.
Thanks for all the comments. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
That's because Westernport Bay is bent Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Hehe. There is some good spots down there to photograph. When I was down there last year I saw this lovelly big tree that sat on a hill that I wanted to capture. I then later saw it in a book on Mornington Penninsula. Went down there today to capture it and the lovely old thing is no longer there. Given the amount of trees chopped up on the side of the road, I gather it was blown down during a storm
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper:
i think the blown out highlights from the sun are natural looking, and its simply perfect as is! on antoher note, how many shots is this, and do u simply use PS to stitch? have you heard of panoramic factory?
Submarine at stoney pointKipper, great shot mate, leave it as it is, some years ago i had the ''pleasure''??? of going for a trip in one of the Oberon class
Subs,an interesting experience ,and the ''smells'' are not something easily forgotten, i love pics of Subs and have a lot on film,but very few on digital, must buy a scanner !, sunrises are fantastic i wish i could find the motivation to photograph more of them. Nikon boy Norman
Dee, I use Pano Factory. It was my first pano shot taken with my G1325 and M-20. The shot was taken using 14 shots in portrait orientation. The final crop was about 50% of what it initially was. Due to too much difference in exposure (how I don't know) and some really bad seams (guess I didn't have the tripod base or head that level).
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|