|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by leek on Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:12 pm
Another shot from (IMHO) my very productive session in the Sydney Botanical Gardens on Sunday...
This innocent looking photo is actually a cropped 3-part Pano taken with the kit-lens at F4.2... I have an equivalent single shot with the kit lens and the additional detail in the pano is very noticable...
As well as commenting on the photo, could you please try to offer up an explanation of what the right-hand half of the sculpture represents????
I can see Mother Earth (which was the title of the piece) in the left hand part, but the right hand half has lost me... 
[LARGE VERSION] [HUGE VERSION]
-
leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by Justin on Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:25 am
If the left is the head, body and arms then the right is the legs. Poor dude has sunk into the rock...
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
-
Justin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Newtown, Sydeny
-
by the foto fanatic on Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:00 am
Justin wrote:If the left is the head, body and arms then the right is the legs. Poor dude has sunk into the rock...
....or is emerging from it, like a child emerging from its mother. 
-
the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
![[LARGE VERSION]](http://jpeake.smugmug.com/photos/19942238-L.jpg){kind=link}
![[HUGE VERSION]](http://jpeake.smugmug.com/photos/19942238-O.jpg){kind=link}