~Port of Los Angeles~Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wow, the colours in the second are wonderful, perhaps a little too saturated for my liking, but still great. Wonderful shot, though I'd have liked perhaps a little less water and a bit more sky?
With the first one, the blown highlight draws me away from the bridge and the rest of the subject matter, and keeps doing so despite my attempts to refocus, so it doesn't do much for me I'm afraid. If you could PS it out or something I'd love the shot!
Hey Dee,
These are pretty cool. I love the golden reflection in the water of the 1st, but it would probably work a little darker as well. The second looks a little oversaturated, which seems to be your style, but I think it is a touch oversaturated for me as well. Most of your pics sort of walk that fine line which is good I think. BTW I'm moving to the West End. THinking about joining the legendary West End Photographic society. Have you heard of them? Do you go down there much?
thanks for the critiques guys...
i think ill work on them both... Dave: never heard of it, what's it all about?
I like the first one... a bit postcard-ish for my taste, but I do like it.
The second one is too saturdated for my liking... I feel my eye keeps attacking small bits of red in the background as opposed to looking at the whole of the image. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
You worked the shadows too hard in the first on I feel... to the point the colour noise detracts from the image IMHO.
Second is extremely saturated. Too rule of thirdish to me. I'd have preferred a crop leaving out all the featureless water.
Flip Frog
love the first! Second one I love the colour saturation, my opinion I suppose. Like MCWB has pointed out though, more of the saturated sky would've looked better than so much water in the frame, from my point of view. Personally I would've Photoshopped the word "hatsu" out, detracts from the true subject I think. Otherwise GOOD JOB! Respect to those who click!
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|