more dog show shots, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

more dog show shots, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8

Postby KerryPierce on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:21 am

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF
1/125s f/2.8 at 150.0mm ISO 1600 with Flash hand held

Image

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF
1/125s f/2.8 at 180.0mm ISO 1600 with Flash hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby cordy on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:35 am

Nice shots!

How do you find the Sigma? I have one as well and its pretty much the only lense I now shoot with given the oppurtunity

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Postby stubbsy on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:43 am

Kerry - you made me do this!

That first one is some weird dog. I can't decide whether it's ugly or cute, but whatever, it's a beautiful shot. Great lighting, nice sharp focus and excellent composition. And you used a Sigma. Imaging how much better this would be with Nikkon glass :wink:

The second shot is good also, but I find the ring above the dog's head very distracting - maybe a little cloning or a blur needed?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby fozzie on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:44 am

Kerry - Great work again. I just adore your animal shots.

And the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF is proving to be a winner.
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:46 am

You obviously love dogs Kerry and, as always, your shots are superb.

The first dog is adorable, can’t remember the name, but do know that they are a Chinese sacred dog.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby KerryPierce on Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:07 pm

Thanks, guys. Glad you liked the shots. :D

Cordy (Chris): I like the lens a great deal, especially after the marathon sessions I had at the dog show where these shots were taken. :)

Peter: You're correct about the dog's lead being distracting, but I don't usually put a lot of effort into post processing for stuff going to pbase. The first shot is of a Sharpei, (sp?) the loose skinned, wrinkle dog. My Sigma 70-200 has a paint job with Nikkor on the side and sports a Nikkor lens cap.. :twisted:

Fozzie: Thanks. I do like the lens. :)

sirhc55 (Chris): Yes, I love animals, dogs especially. I have a pair of Akitas. IIRC, you're correct in that the Sharpeis were dogs reserved to the royalty in China.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby flipfrog on Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:09 pm

very sharp images, and beautiful dogs!
good work Kerry!
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:52 am

flipfrog wrote:very sharp images, and beautiful dogs!
good work Kerry!


Thanks for the kind comment, Dee. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Greg B on Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:44 am

Fantastic shots Kerry, those dogs leap off the screen, really something.

Woof.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:55 am

Greg B wrote:Fantastic shots Kerry, those dogs leap off the screen, really something.

Woof.


Thanks for the kind compliments, Greg. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Killakoala on Wed Apr 20, 2005 7:00 pm

That first dog needs a good ironing.

Great pics, so sharp too. Not bad for a Sigma. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby dooda on Wed Apr 20, 2005 7:20 pm

Killakoala wrote:That first dog needs a good ironing.

Great pics, so sharp too. Not bad for a Sigma. :)


All that extra skin and hair, what a waste. I'm sure if I could just lop a little off he wouldn't notice.

Great pics Kerry. Shot at ISO 1600 and I don't see much noise at all, what gives?
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:02 am

Killakoala wrote:That first dog needs a good ironing.

Great pics, so sharp too. Not bad for a Sigma. :)


Agreed on the ironing job. :) Thanks for the kind comment, Steve. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:13 am

dooda wrote:Great pics Kerry. Shot at ISO 1600 and I don't see much noise at all, what gives?


Thanks, Dave. :) Seems to me that noise isn't much of an issue on shots that are exposed properly or slightly overexposed. You'll still see it, especially in the shadow areas. On theses shots, IIRC, I worked in layers and did a mild NR on the bottom layer and removed the background in the upper layer. Any sharpening and contrast adjustments are made only on the subject on the upper layer. Both sharpening and contrast adjustments will bring out the noise, which is why I use the layer technique.

I haven't had my first cup of coffee yet, :shock: so if I'm not making sense here, please ask for a clarification. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques