more dog show shots, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
more dog show shots, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8Nikon D70 ,Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF
1/125s f/2.8 at 150.0mm ISO 1600 with Flash hand held Nikon D70 ,Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF 1/125s f/2.8 at 180.0mm ISO 1600 with Flash hand held my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Kerry - you made me do this!
That first one is some weird dog. I can't decide whether it's ugly or cute, but whatever, it's a beautiful shot. Great lighting, nice sharp focus and excellent composition. And you used a Sigma. Imaging how much better this would be with Nikkon glass The second shot is good also, but I find the ring above the dog's head very distracting - maybe a little cloning or a blur needed? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
You obviously love dogs Kerry and, as always, your shots are superb.
The first dog is adorable, can’t remember the name, but do know that they are a Chinese sacred dog. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thanks, guys. Glad you liked the shots.
Cordy (Chris): I like the lens a great deal, especially after the marathon sessions I had at the dog show where these shots were taken. Peter: You're correct about the dog's lead being distracting, but I don't usually put a lot of effort into post processing for stuff going to pbase. The first shot is of a Sharpei, (sp?) the loose skinned, wrinkle dog. My Sigma 70-200 has a paint job with Nikkor on the side and sports a Nikkor lens cap.. Fozzie: Thanks. I do like the lens. sirhc55 (Chris): Yes, I love animals, dogs especially. I have a pair of Akitas. IIRC, you're correct in that the Sharpeis were dogs reserved to the royalty in China. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Thanks for the kind comment, Dee. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Fantastic shots Kerry, those dogs leap off the screen, really something.
Woof. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Thanks for the kind compliments, Greg. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
That first dog needs a good ironing.
Great pics, so sharp too. Not bad for a Sigma. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
All that extra skin and hair, what a waste. I'm sure if I could just lop a little off he wouldn't notice. Great pics Kerry. Shot at ISO 1600 and I don't see much noise at all, what gives?
Agreed on the ironing job. Thanks for the kind comment, Steve. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Thanks, Dave. Seems to me that noise isn't much of an issue on shots that are exposed properly or slightly overexposed. You'll still see it, especially in the shadow areas. On theses shots, IIRC, I worked in layers and did a mild NR on the bottom layer and removed the background in the upper layer. Any sharpening and contrast adjustments are made only on the subject on the upper layer. Both sharpening and contrast adjustments will bring out the noise, which is why I use the layer technique. I haven't had my first cup of coffee yet, so if I'm not making sense here, please ask for a clarification. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|