D70 at a weekend wedding

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

D70 at a weekend wedding

Postby owen on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:21 pm

User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Matt. K on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:30 pm

Owen
Nicely done.
Skin tones are about 8% too heavy on my monitor but colour balance is spot on. Like the creative touch.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:03 am

Well done Owen - a touch of traditional and a touch of avante garde - I like :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby BBJ on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:14 am

Owen, they look great to me and i think you did a good job, i have never done this but i would be happy with these as well. The gardens look nice and yeh dont if you could have go into that archway but would have made some nice shots as well.
Cheers
John
BBJ
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Re: D70 at a weekend wedding

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:08 am

owen wrote:Hi Guys. Took my camera along to my step sisters wedding on Saturday and I got what I feel are some great shots. Here are just a taste of them:



They look good to me, Owen. A notch dark, but still quite nice. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby owen on Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:23 am

Thanks for the comments guys. They are a bit dark, but I spot metered off the brides face when I could. The dress was close to overexposing in a lot of shots as well so I couldn't do too much of a levels adjustment.

One thing I did notice was that I really could have done with a VR lens. I got a lot of blurry shots as the light faded. I guess I could have used Auto ISO to get the shutter speeds I needed.

Thanks for checking them out :)
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby birddog114 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:37 am

owen wrote:One thing I did notice was that I really could have done with a VR lens. I got a lot of blurry shots as the light faded. I guess I could have used Auto ISO to get the shutter speeds I needed.

Thanks for checking them out :)


Owen,
VR lens is nice to have, but monopod might helps as well.
AUTO ISO is the worst part to use, just please forget it.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby owen on Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:49 am

Noisy pictures are better than no pictures I think. You can get rid of noise in neatimage but you can't very successfully get rid of bluriness.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby birddog114 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:51 am

owen wrote:Noisy pictures are better than no pictures I think. You can get rid of noise in neatimage but you can't very successfully get rid of bluriness.


Noisy picture can be done by manually selecting proper ISO and correct meter, other side AUTO ISO is not.

Edit: The external SB-600 or SB-800 may help also.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:56 am

owen wrote:One thing I did notice was that I really could have done with a VR lens. I got a lot of blurry shots as the light faded. I guess I could have used Auto ISO to get the shutter speeds I needed.


Something i've learnt through experience with my VR lens is that it's not always as useful as you might think. I would say get a tripod/monopod before a VR lens because while the shots you took may have been blurry because of your hand shake, VR will most likely just introduce blur from the subject's movements, which is harder to see on the LCD and just as bad when it comes to printing the shots..

From what I can see, VR is very useful when you're at a long focal length and would like to keep the camera steady for longer than normal ( 1/length ) but still a faster shutter speed than will blur the subject ( 1/125 I think is what is quoted ). Of course, VR is probably also useful for low-light landscapes and other mostly static scenes..
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby Click on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:04 pm

Love the shots Owen! Looks like it was perfect day for your Step Sister! But whats she doing wading through those thigh high shrbs..haha!
But seriously, great angles used, they speak volumes. Have you considered lifting/saturating a bit of the green to brighten the dull background contrast? Just a thought
Respect to those who click!
Click
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby Killakoala on Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:50 pm

I love those last two pics. I ask myself, 'why is the bride hiding over the other side of the garden'. :) Fantastic :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques