Not a dog, AFAIK... Sigma 50-500

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Not a dog, AFAIK... Sigma 50-500

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:23 am

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX APO RF
1/1000s f/7.1 at 500.0mm ISO 400 hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby gstark on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:27 am

Kerry,

Your subject line: are you referring to the the subject matter of the photo, or the lens? :)

Seriously, and as always, a great image. Thanx.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Greg B on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:29 am

Great shot, and it is fun to see Gary having to say something positive about the good work of someone using a Sigma lens :D

Anyway Kerry, sensational colour and sharpness. Excellent.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:34 am

Kerry - I like the photo but in this instance I feel that this big Sigma doe not match the smaller sibling (70-200) - BTW I have the 2x Sigma converter and was very impressed with the quality on the 70-200 which apparently is a perfect match.

Back to the pic - I do like the very smooth OOF background and you have captured this little fella in a classic pose and sharp too.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby the foto fanatic on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:35 am

Yup. Great image alright. :D
Really sharp, and a lovely warm OOF background.
It looks like a sparrow, but seems rather too colourful in the plumage to be one. Australian sparrows are a dirty brown colour, without much contrast..
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:37 am

Greg B wrote:Great shot, and it is fun to see Gary having to say something positive about the good work of someone using a Sigma lens :D

Anyway Kerry, sensational colour and sharpness. Excellent.


Actually Greg, Gary has done that a few times especially when the lens was not mentioned :roll: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby gstark on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:46 am

sirhc55 wrote:
Greg B wrote:Great shot, and it is fun to see Gary having to say something positive about the good work of someone using a Sigma lens :D

Anyway Kerry, sensational colour and sharpness. Excellent.


Actually Greg, Gary has done that a few times especially when the lens was not mentioned :roll: :lol:


Chris,

As we all know, the lens is only a part of the equation, and a small part at that. But I can usually tell - especially with your images. ;)

What's probably more important is, for images that I've looked at, when I do not say something. That comes under the general heading of "if you can't say something nice ... ".

Fortunately, nobody but myself knows which images I've seen (and chosen to not comment on) as against those images that I've not yet looked at, and so the general absence of a comment by myself does not mean that I'm in biting-my-tongue mode.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:49 am

gstark wrote:Kerry,

Your subject line: are you referring to the the subject matter of the photo, or the lens? :)


Both. The subject looks kinda like a bird to me and the lens isn't a dog, it's more like an elephant..... :shock:

Seriously, and as always, a great image. Thanx.


Thank you, sir. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:51 am

Greg B wrote:Great shot, and it is fun to see Gary having to say something positive about the good work of someone using a Sigma lens :D

Anyway Kerry, sensational colour and sharpness. Excellent.


:lol: That's funny, Greg. :D Thanks for your kind comments. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:00 am

sirhc55 wrote:Kerry - I like the photo but in this instance I feel that this big Sigma doe not match the smaller sibling (70-200) - BTW I have the 2x Sigma converter and was very impressed with the quality on the 70-200 which apparently is a perfect match.

Not sure I follow you here. :shock: I too, have the 2x Sigma convertor, but I wasn't happy with the results when I last tried it, especially compared to the Bigma with the 100mm more reach. This photo isn't a big crop either. IIRC, it's just cropped to the 4:3 aspect.
Back to the pic - I do like the very smooth OOF background and you have captured this little fella in a classic pose and sharp too.


Thanks, Chris. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:02 am

cricketfan wrote:Yup. Great image alright. :D
Really sharp, and a lovely warm OOF background.
It looks like a sparrow, but seems rather too colourful in the plumage to be one. Australian sparrows are a dirty brown colour, without much contrast..


Thanks for the kind comment. :D This is what we called a common barn sparrow, when I was a kid. Dunno what the real name might be... :(
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Click on Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:57 am

cricketfan wrote:Yup. Great image alright. :D
Really sharp, and a lovely warm OOF background.
It looks like a sparrow, but seems rather too colourful in the plumage to be one. Australian sparrows are a dirty brown colour, without much contrast..

It looks like a Finch to me...

Hey Kerry, as always great shot... Any reason why you did'nt crop it?
Respect to those who click!
Click
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:00 pm

PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:02 pm

Nicely captured. Good DOF and colours.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Glen on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:09 pm

Kerry, the red OOF background is quite different and really lifts the image. Great
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:51 pm

Click wrote:It looks like a Finch to me...

Could be a finch, dunno. I know as much about birds as I know about wimmin, which is pretty much zero.... :(
Hey Kerry, as always great shot... Any reason why you did'nt crop it?


Thanks for the kind comment. :D Don't have a good answer on why I didn't crop it more. :( I guess it's just my nature. I generally only crop to remove junk or change the composition more to my liking.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:55 pm

Thanks to Arthur and Glen for your great compliments. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:59 pm

That's a really, really, really nice image.

But you can't get another picture of the week next week. ;)

It reminds me of art by Michael Parekowhai, honestly, but that might be because I've had to look at it for the past month.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:04 pm

Nnnnsic wrote:That's a really, really, really nice image.


Thank you very much, Leigh. :D

But you can't get another picture of the week next week. ;)


heh, well the pay is still the same. :lol:

It reminds me of art by Michael Parekowhai, honestly, but that might be because I've had to look at it for the past month.


Wow :shock: That guy is selling that stuff? Very cool. 8)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:11 pm

KerryPierce wrote:Wow :shock: That guy is selling that stuff? Very cool. 8)


I'm off topic, but yes... I saw someone buy some on the weekend.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:27 pm

Nnnnsic wrote:
KerryPierce wrote:Wow :shock: That guy is selling that stuff? Very cool. 8)


I'm off topic, but yes... I saw someone buy some on the weekend.


Not off topic completely. :) I'll send you the original of this shot. You print off a couple dozen and sell them along with his stuff and I'll split the profits with you 50-50. 8)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Neeper on Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:15 pm

Beautiful shot. It's called a House Sparrow. There are tons of them here.

http://www.birds.cornell.edu/BOW/HOUSPA/
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:41 am

Neeper wrote:Beautiful shot. It's called a House Sparrow. There are tons of them here.


Thanks, Neeper. :) I think I got mixed up on my birds. I believe it was called a house sparrow when I was a kid. Another bird, a swallow, was associated with barns, called a barn swallow, IIRC.... :?
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques