How you determine sharpness in your raw pics

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

How you determine sharpness in your raw pics

Postby samester on Thu Apr 21, 2005 1:10 am

Hi,

I have been shooting slide film for a few years now and with my 8x and 22x loupes along with my light box, i could usually pick out the tack sharp pics without too much hassle.

Now with the D70 though, i'm not too sure what a tack sharp pic looks like.

To clarify, some pics look awesome at 25% but then at 100% they appear a little soft. Not too sure if my monitor/desktop res are working against me here.

So how does everyone guage how sharp a raw pic is - for example should facial features will ultra sharp at 100% as you scroll across a portrait for example.

Is there a particular image size and desktop resolution that gives a good overall feel for raw sharpness prior to any post processing ?

Would love to hear how everyone checks to see how sharp their pics are straight off the cam.

Cheers,
Sam
samester
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney, Penrith Area

Postby Link on Thu Apr 21, 2005 3:02 am

I usually check sharpness by viewing the photo at 100% on my computer screen - it's easy to detect if an image is out of focus or too soft. That gives me an idea of the overall technical quality of the shot (ie, can it be printed large and remain sharp). Ideally, facial features should be sharp even at 100% but in practive it depends a lot on your lens. I personnally found that if it looks sharp at 66%, it's usually good enough for a 12*8 print.

And a soft image will still look good printed at a smaller size...

Link.
User avatar
Link
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Nowra

Postby Onyx on Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:39 pm

I guess this one comes down to practice, and your personal preferences of what's acceptably sharp. Keep in mind the 0 sharpness setting on the camera or in Capture doesn't mean no sharpening applied. So many of the images you'll be looking at have been artificially sharpened.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:54 pm

I touch my screen and if the photo cuts my finger then I don’t apply any USM :roll:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Glen on Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:06 pm

sirhc55 wrote:I touch my screen and if the photo cuts my finger then I don’t apply any USM :roll:
:lol: :lol:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Matt. K on Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:02 pm

Ultimately sharpness should be determined by evaluating a print. Keep in mind that most computer monitors display at a resolution of 72 DPI. You can get an aproximate idea of the sharpness from a monitor but a print produced at 300 DPI will reveal far more information.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to General Discussion