| Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
 
		
			Moderator: Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by johndec on Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:47 pm
 I realise that prosumer DSLR's are built to a price and so I was wondering (dreaming) how much a camera of the following specs would cost.  For fun lets call it a D200     1. D70(s) body with optional vertical grip. (Minimize expense of a new body)
 2. Viewfinder of D2H or D2X.
 3. Mostly the same frame rates, AF, metering, file formats, etc, etc as the D70, after all we are working to a price point (although the CAM2000 AF mod ule would be nice).
 4. The expensive bit: the D2X CMOS     5. I can live without the D2X high speed mod e.
 Comments, additions or subtractions welcome, but don't get greedy.... 
			
				 johndec
Senior Member Posts: 1327Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pmLocation: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200.... 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:57 pm
 Hmm, ~3500 buckaroos, give or take a few. Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by johndec on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:00 pm
 Killakoala wrote:Hmm, ~3500 buckaroos, give or take a few.
 Would you pay that? I'd be tempted.... 
			
				 johndec
Senior Member Posts: 1327Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pmLocation: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200.... 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sirhc55 on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:10 pm
 The one major thing you did not include in your list is the D2X AF system - far superior to the D70 - $3,500 sounds right although $2,000 would be better  Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
 by johndec on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:13 pm
 sirhc55 wrote:The one major thing you did not include in your list is the D2X AF system - far superior to the D70 - $3,500 sounds right although $2,000 would be better  
 Ahh, but I did       CAM2000 is the D2X AF mod ule. 
			
				 johndec
Senior Member Posts: 1327Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pmLocation: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200.... 
 
		
		
			
			
 by kipper on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:37 pm
 Sirhc, is that the same as the D2H? I think I droolled over NikonBoys when i saw it. Darryl  (aka Kipper)Nikon D200
 
			
				kipper
			Senior Member Posts: 3738Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pmLocation: Hampshire, UK 
 
		
		
			
			
 by christiand on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:50 pm
 The D2X at $2000 would be just fine, thanks.
 Cheers
 CD
 
			
				 christiand
Senior Member Posts: 1989Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pmLocation: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Onyx on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:50 pm
 Metal or plastic outer skin? Personally I don't give a toss either way, as Nikon has so far released superbly build DSLRs (the D50 remains to be seen).
 The D2Hs could very well be the mid range "prosumer" replacement for the D100 - nearly all the features of the D2X but missing some vitals that doesn't quite make it flagship material.
 
 $AU2995 retail would be tempting.
 
			
				 Onyx
Senior Member Posts: 3631Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pmLocation: westsyd.nsw.au
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by sirhc55 on Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:58 pm
 johndec wrote:sirhc55 wrote:The one major thing you did not include in your list is the D2X AF system - far superior to the D70 - $3,500 sounds right although $2,000 would be better  
 Ahh, but I did       CAM2000 is the D2X AF mod ule.
 Just cleaned my glasses, and so you did    Kipper the D2H has the CAM2000 unit as well - very nice.Chris--------------------------------
 I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
 
			
				 sirhc55
Key Member Posts: 12930Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pmLocation: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10 
 
		
		
			
			
 by johndec on Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:00 pm
 Onyx wrote:The D2Hs could very well be the mid range "prosumer" replacement for the D100 - nearly all the features of the D2X but missing some vitals that doesn't quite make it flagship material.
 $AU2995 retail would be tempting.
 I don't think so for 2 reasons.
 1. Not all "prosumers" want the bulk of an inbuilt vertical grip.
 2. 4mp.  The great unwashed will sacrifice features for a larger MP number, even if they never print anything larger than 6x4 (and Canon, Nikon, et al, only have themselves to blame for this). 
			
				 johndec
Senior Member Posts: 1327Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pmLocation: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200.... 
 
 Return to General Discussion |