Wedding pics from a few months ago (4 in total)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Wedding pics from a few months ago (4 in total)

Postby Killakoala on Sun May 01, 2005 9:39 pm

4 random photos from about 230 wedding photos from a friends wedding. Reproduced here with permission.

The photos below were taken with the D70, SB800 and 17-35mm 2.8 and the 85mm 1.4 kindly lent by Birddog. My first and last wedding as photographer.

All processed in Photoshop.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby BBJ on Sun May 01, 2005 9:45 pm

Steve, these are really nice pics as i have said in post before other than doing this for a friend i would not like the responsibility of doing this for job. But you have done well, i have a mate who is getting hitched again and he wants me to do some pics for them which i dont mind 2nd time round for them so no big deal.
How would the 50.. 1.8 lens go for using at a wedding? do u know, or someone eles might know.
Thanks
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby Killakoala on Sun May 01, 2005 9:54 pm

I've heard of some bloke who uses ONLY a 50mm lens for weddings and gets great results, but that's with film, so i reckon a 35mm would be fine for digital.

The 50mm 1.8 is a fine lens, so long as you use it no wider than about F4 it will render very nice sharp photos that you can 'de-focus' in photoshop later on.

You have enough talent to do a fine job and i am sure you will do a job that the bride and groom will be happy with. Good luck to you.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby shutterbug on Sun May 01, 2005 9:58 pm

Hi Steve, the 2nd image is tops :)

I love using the 50mm to capture weddings in the days of 35mm film. It is abit tight now with the crop factor on the D70.
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby Killakoala on Sun May 01, 2005 10:06 pm

The 2nd pic is with the 85mm 1.4, which i loved so much i bought one.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 01, 2005 11:12 pm

Steve

I really like the first one. For me this is problematic as on close inspection the focus looks odd - couple blurred & background sharp. Yet it works. Maybe this was intentional PP or maybe is just my tired old eyes :wink:

Curious: Why LAST wedding?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Geoff on Sun May 01, 2005 11:55 pm

Killakoala wrote:I've heard of some bloke who uses ONLY a 50mm lens for weddings and gets great results, but that's with film, so i reckon a 35mm would be fine for digital.

The 50mm 1.8 is a fine lens, so long as you use it no wider than about F4 it will render very nice sharp photos that you can 'de-focus' in photoshop later on.

You have enough talent to do a fine job and i am sure you will do a job that the bride and groom will be happy with. Good luck to you.


Hi guys,
I think ONLY using a 50mm 1.8 lens for an entire wedding (film or digital) is not a wise choice, especially for big group shots etc..you'd have to stand a long way back to get a half decent shot. The use of a nice lens like the 17-55DX and perhaps the 70-200VR and then with the addition of the 50mm 1.8 that would be great combination I think. Not putting this idea down, but just putting my two cents worth in. Be interested to see what others think.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby redline on Mon May 02, 2005 12:52 am

same i wouldn't agree with someone using a 50mm for an entire wedding, unless it was some extreme look to their photos i would forgive.

last wedding as photographer

why?
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Glen on Mon May 02, 2005 8:30 am

Like Vince, I like the second best. They must be happy with you :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques