Number of exposures on big CF card

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Number of exposures on big CF card

Postby Frankenstein on Sun May 01, 2005 8:08 pm

I've started playing with RAW files, and when I make this setting on the D70 the camera indicator shows 96 exposures remaining for an empty 1 GB card. However when I've looked at the file sizes of the raw shots, they're averaging about 5.5MB each - when I do the maths that should mean 186 exposures. Now, I've heard elsewhere that the camera does underestimate the number of shots remaining, but by half?? So I just sat with my finger on the shutter button and filled the card, and guess how many exposures there were - 186! It seems amazing that the software can underestimate by this magnitude.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby johndec on Sun May 01, 2005 8:21 pm

Yeah, crazy isn't it :roll: This has been discussed several times here and on other forums, some say it's just Nikon being conservative, others say it's a stuff up when Nikon forgot to allow for the fact that the NEF's are compressed when they designed the firmware.
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby digitor on Sun May 01, 2005 8:29 pm

It's documented in the manual, it uses the example of 44 shots capacity for 256M card, camera displays 23. (Page 45)

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby SoCal Steve on Sun May 01, 2005 8:44 pm

What makes no sense to me is that the D70s has the same problem with counting NEF exposures according to Nikon's .pdf brochure for it. You'd think that they would have fixed that this time around. :roll:
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby sirhc55 on Sun May 01, 2005 10:39 pm

From my own calculations the in-camera size of pics depends on the amount of information within each pic. This being the case, you will never get an exact number of pics for a given size of CF.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby MCWB on Mon May 02, 2005 12:06 am

Frank: a rough rule of thumb is that you can double the amount of exposures left that the camera shows when shooting RAW. :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Greg B on Mon May 02, 2005 12:16 am

.... which, at least, is better than having to halve it :D
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to General Discussion