DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
city of angels...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dee
I get the concept, but the shot doesn't grab me, sorry. Too much white. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
maybe it is blown. . . but it really grabs me anyway I'm not sure the shot would really benefit from anything more being visible in the upper portion.
The depth is exceptional. . . . does it for me.
urg... LAX... erg....
Not an airport I like.... New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Sorry Dee - this is one of a very few from the Flipfrog Portfolio that I'm not keen on. I can accept the sky being blown out but on my screen the whole top edge of the aircraft is gone. Teneriffe all over again....
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Please explain? I agree that the upper two-thirds of this image appear over-exposed. I don't know that I really get this pic. Sorry. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Refers to the world's worst air disaster in Teneriffe (not your suburb!) in the mid-80s. I think something like 590 people killed when a KLM 747 took off without clearance up the runway that was also being used as a taxiway. A Pan Am jet taxiing into position barely managed to turn slightly to avoid collision as the KLM plane rotated. Without enough clearance, the KLM took the roof off the Pan Am, opening it up like a tin of spaghetti. Everyone on the KLM was killed, almost everyone on the Pan Am. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanx, Simon. Yes, the mention of Teneriffe had me perplexed momentarily. But I do remember that disaster now. BTW, in 1986 I was leaving Greece to fly to London ( I was on holidays). The Qantas jumbo I was on had to taxi past a BA jumbo that had been involved in a terrorist attack at Athens airport.
The BA jet had half its fuselage blown out - you could have heard a pin drop on my flight as all the passengers on board had a sobering reminder of the risks of air travel. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
