PelicansModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PelicansIm sorry if this post turn up twice, as i thought i posted it this morning but cant seem to find it.
These shots were taken on the Central Coast of NSW last weekend. I was a bit unsure as to which white balance and metering system would give the best results. I ended up using the default matrix and auto WB. All images taken with 70-300ED lens at the long end and at iso320.
Nice shots apollocat!! The third one is my personal favourite. Firstly, what time of day was it when you shot these? Second - did you shoot in raw? Thirdly- on my monitor they all look to be a LITTLE on the yellow-ish side..maybe cooling them down a bit could enhance them a bit? They are expectionally sharp, be interested to know the other EXIF data from the shoot. Oh yeah, how far away were you physically from this beautiful big bird? Cheers!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
These are good captures, particularly like #2, good timing. Any PP? Just wondering about sharpening. Looks like the light may have been fairly strong too so looks like you've done well. Shot in JPEG or RAW? Using RAW you can always play with WB later (edit): although the WB looks fine to me (but then again I ain't no judge .
Cheers. Aka Andrew
Geoff, thanks for your comments. In answer to your question; the time was mid afternoon 1510, all pics were shot in normal jpeg mode, the distance would of varied from about 15-30m though of course they got to within 1m but weren't flying when they did so. Whenevr i modify pics with PS i lose the exif data, any reason for that??
Mudder, I'm still a little clumsy with PS and they only procesing i did was autocontrast (which seems to give the best result on my monitor), crop a little and use unsharp mask with values 350,0.3 and 10. Thanks.
Geoff, have you ever seen white birds 100% white?
They can be mucky little tikes. However I do agree that they is a small trace of lemon in there. Not much but just back off the warmth a smidgeon. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
I think number 2. I love the way his legs are splashing the water......it's like "touchdown". Although it has not quite got the sharpness/focus of number 3, for me it's got a bit more emotion and drama. Well done on them all.
I know nutzinc
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|