Streaker - Opera HouseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Streaker - Opera HouseDo you think this picture is ruined by the Streaks or enhanced?
Also Should i crop out the right hand side (thinner streaks) Your (any thoughts) thoughts will be appreciated Only thing I changed is to BW Full size - resized to 800x600 Lens Tokina 17mm ATX D100 43 Second exposure F32 Tripod Also for this one i tried to use recession techique to draw the user to the opera house? Do you think it works? Opera%20House%20back2.jpg" alt="Image" /> Sigma 24-70mm DG EX Last edited by ipv6ready on Sun May 08, 2005 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm back
D3s D700 D200, SB-900, SB-800 x2, SB-600 x4
Now that is interesting because I can’t see any shape or form. I have looked at this pic a few times and I do like it but wondered whether it would look better cropped top and bottom to a horizontal pano
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thank you I will try that when I figure out how to do it I'm back
D3s D700 D200, SB-900, SB-800 x2, SB-600 x4
The second shot works for me though I'd like a little more interest in the foreground. A bicycle leaning on a wall, a child looking over the sea wall, someone walking on the path. Something to break the monotony but not enough to distract from the strong lines leading to the Opera House.
I don't like the first shot. In B&W these streaks don't work as far as i'm concerned. Turning the streaks into vibrant colors (? pink, yellow) may do someting. There is also a strong step artifact in the streaks on the left. Presumably a resizing issue but if this is present on the original image I wouldn't bother with it further. shakey
The first shot would look fantastic as a pano crop. Remove most of the sky and part of the fence to draw the eye more to the the streaks and opera house. What does it look like in colour?
I like the way the divider draws the eye to the opera house, however as a b&w, the opera house tends to blend in with the clouds a bit too much. Maybe adjust the levels or the opera house or the clouds a bit more and crop out the right side of the photo. The peopl walking don't really contribute to the photo My 2c.
I have to say the first image just doesn't do it for me. The streaks really detract from rather than add to the capture and the B& W probably accentuates this.
The second image is a completely different matter. I think it works extremely well and is a great take on a very well photographed landmark. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|