Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by fozzie on Sun May 08, 2005 9:30 pm
Took my new lens out today. Conditions were not ideal: windy, plus hand held. I definitely need to spend more time with this superb lens.
1/60sec f/13 ISO200
1/100sec f/13 ISO200
1/100sec f/13 ISO200
Comments welcomed.
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by mudder on Sun May 08, 2005 9:34 pm
Pics look really sharp and great colour especially #2. Looks like the lighting was very harsh which would have made it tricky...
Dumb question though , why F13? Just curious...
Aka Andrew
-
mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by birddog114 on Sun May 08, 2005 9:37 pm
# 2 is tack sharp with the 200/4, how do you compare it with the Sigma 150/2.8?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-
birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by fozzie on Sun May 08, 2005 9:53 pm
Birddog114,
Birddog114 wrote:# 2 is tack sharp with the 200/4, how do you compare it with the Sigma 150/2.8?
We are not comparing apples with apples, plus the price differential - wow. What I can say, is that it is extremely well-balanced, focusing ring is firm and very solid build. Next time I will definitely use my tripod.
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by Glen on Mon May 09, 2005 12:07 pm
Gives us your comparison anyway of the differences, would be interesting to read. Nice images
-
Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by sirhc55 on Mon May 09, 2005 12:33 pm
Nice ones Fozzie - better than the average bear
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-
sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by SoCal Steve on Mon May 09, 2005 12:58 pm
Very dramatic shots, Fozzie. And fooie on anyone who makes cracks about blown highlights. Light is dynamic, damnit.
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
-
SoCal Steve
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
by Jenno on Mon May 09, 2005 2:30 pm
Hi Fozzie
I find it difficult with my 180 to obtain sharp shots hand held so you have done exceptionally well but...
It's amazing what a different Gitzo makes
Ray
-
Jenno
- Member
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:15 pm
- Location: The Hills District Sydney
by fozzie on Mon May 09, 2005 7:38 pm
Ray,
Jenno wrote:Hi Fozzie
I find it difficult with my 180 to obtain sharp shots hand held so you have done exceptionally well but... It's amazing what a different Gitzo makes
Ray
I must admit hand held is not easy, but this lens is very well balanced in the hand. Long weekend is coming up 14-16th May (Adelaide Cup Day), so I will get everything together (Gitzo G-1327 tripod/SB-800) and hopefully do a better job, subject to weather of course. Glen - at the same time I will do comparison shots (Nikon AF 200mm f/4 D ID ED, as against Sigma APO 150mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM , ie identical settings and report back early next week. mudder - according to Ron Reznick: The lens is very good at all apertures between f/4 and f/11, but it is best used at wider apertures only at longer range or with a subject that requires maximum isolation at shorter range... f/8 to f/11 provides best results at very close range.] BTW: Thank you to everyone for your opinions and comments.
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by Nicole on Mon May 09, 2005 7:59 pm
Wow....a lucky man! Looks like you are already having a blast with the new lens. Are you going to keep the Sigma 150? Not that i can afford it...
-
Nicole
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
by fozzie on Mon May 09, 2005 8:11 pm
Nicole,
Nicole wrote:Wow....a lucky man! Looks like you are already having a blast with the new lens. Are you going to keep the Sigma 150? Not that i can afford it...
Yes, I am going to hold onto the Sigma 150mm f/2.8. Sorry, but I never sell assets. You never know when you need them. This way, I can belong to the Nikon and Sigma clubs .
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by Glen on Mon May 09, 2005 8:20 pm
Fozszie, can't wait for the comparison. I have noticed there was a small price difference between the two
-
Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by fozzie on Mon May 09, 2005 8:33 pm
Glen,
Glen wrote:Fozszie, can't wait for the comparison. I have noticed there was a small price difference between the two
Just a tad .
I'm on bread and water for the next month .
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by fozzie on Tue May 17, 2005 9:58 am
Glen,
Glen wrote:Fozszie, can't wait for the comparison. I have noticed there was a small price difference between the two
Even with a long weekend past, the weather, Saturday - rain, Sunday and Monday - fine, but too much wind to carry out comparison. Next weekend is out - Mother's 80th Birthday, so the weekend 28-29th May looks good.
Have a great day,
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-
fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by yeocsa on Tue May 17, 2005 10:29 am
Hi,
The Sigma 150 f2.8 is alot cheaper than Nikon 200f4. Check it out at stores such as B&H and Adorama. They are not of the same class. Optically and handling, 200F4 is a notch better.
regards,
Arthur
-
yeocsa
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|