Some d70s meet ShotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
33 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some d70s meet ShotsI'm glad I could finaly get at my d70s shots!
Some of my favs from the meet were taken on that body! MCWB with the 70-200VR and SB-800 Taken with the 17-35/2.8 The focus off! Glen with the 52/1.2 noct Taken with the 17-35/2.8 More to follow! I finaly understand the 17-35/2.8 Originaly I thought: Why would people want a lens with such a short focal range when there is the 28-70/2.8???? Now I understand it is the short focusing distance! If I was in a media scrum this is the lens I would want! more to follow New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Re: Some d70s meet ShotsOnly the 24-120 VR, otherwise it would have been in your face. I lost the focus-off, dunno why the 105 macro won?
yeah... WB not spot on... never realised how handy that initial camera guess was...
now, I love the distortion that that lens gives: New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Re: Some d70s meet Shots
Because it was not the 105 macro... it was the 17-35/2.8 New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
And a slightly blown Chris
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
What are you using to PP these Scott???
The WB seems badly off, so I assume that you are using PS ACR to read the Raw and not Nikon Capture... Are you losing the as-shot WB settings??? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
It looks like you gather under a pergola with some sort of translucent roof at Birdy's place.
I am guessing that it is the cause of the yellow/red casts seen in some of the pix from the meet. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
too red?
No WB available... shot with the d70s New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
If this is the sort of results that the D70s is going to give, Nikon need to have their head smashed open with a very loud coconut.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
But then, what are we going to do? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Cheers Chris.
You're not using Windows or Mac are you, Scott? Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Gentoo Linux, Kernel 2.6-rc10
KDE 3.4 DCraw 7.02 New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Are you swearing at us Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hmmm... this raises an interesting angle on the WB encryption debate that I hadn't thought of before... OK... Nikon are encrypting the WB to force people to use Nikon Capture, yet they don't provide a version of Nikon Capture for Linux... Hmmm... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I'd suggest someone takes a WB reading using an ExpoDisc and retake similar photos at the next meet.
A Preset WB might be the answer to the colour cast. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Absolutely! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
I've put two d70s images up..
and am in the process of coping a d2x nef up... (19MB!) New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Re: Some d70s meet Shots
D'oh, fair enough then!
Hi cricketfan... It's not a colour cast - or anything that would be solved by using the Expodisc... It's the result of the WB encryption on the D70S. Due to that, Scott doesn't have access to the as-shot WB data and therefore all the photos appear strange... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Of course WB can be altered to correct the colour cast during PP. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Yes, it can, but that means manually setting for each and every photo... Uugghh!!!...
Looks like it... and anyone else who prefers not to use Nikon Capture... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
later, when I can be bothered... I will have more of a play...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
MHD - Thanks a bunch for posting the D70s NEF files. Getting to actually try opening them in PS Camera Raw was the acid test I was waiting to try. They would not open as NEF's only as VERY low resolution TiFFS (53K). As much as I'd love the new features, my back up will be another D70 body.
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Interesting! Div by 0 error on both D70S nefs. EDIT: D2X worked fine on RM - wb looks good. I thought I read something the other day about dcraw now handling the wb "encryption" OK - maybe an update would fix the issue for you MHD? Cheers What's another word for "thesaurus"?
Previous topic • Next topic
33 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|