Stumped

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Stumped

Postby johnd on Thu May 12, 2005 10:44 pm

I'm a bit stumped with this pic. It's as sharp as a tack printed but gone real soft, almost out of focus when I uploaded it. I'm saving for web in PS, quality 60, size 800 X something to give about 200K.

Image


I don't get it?

Can someone give me some advice please?

Thanks
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby jethro on Thu May 12, 2005 10:46 pm

strange!
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby johndec on Thu May 12, 2005 10:55 pm

John,
After you've resized it, reopen it in PS and apply these USM settings:

Amount: 200-400%
Radius: 0.3
Threshold: 0

(A tip from Scott Kelby's PSCS Book)
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Thu May 12, 2005 10:56 pm

well, when you save it for web, you lost alot of details (quality = 10% or so). Use "save as", select jpeg and then choose the quality that you need.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby PiroStitch on Thu May 12, 2005 11:14 pm

Exactly what has been said. When you sharpened it, it was probably at full res which is ~3000 pixels wide. The image you've posted up is 600px wide so all that sharpening has disappeared due to the size reduction. Jpeg conversion also doesn't help the quality of a photo. If you want it to remain exactly as it was, post it at 100% quality (ie. no compression) but people on a dialup connection will not be your best friend ;)

The best compromise I've seen so far is to resize, save at jpeg ~80% then re-apply a USM to the jpeg. Don't forget when posting images on the web, it is just to provide an indication of the photo and some lost of detail unfortunately has to be deemed acceptable. To gain an accurate picture perfect indication is to print it out and mail it to everyone :twisted:

Hope that helps.
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby stubbsy on Fri May 13, 2005 11:26 am

John

Just to make this completely clear. USM is the last thing to be done when processing an image. So if you want a printable and a web version save your file as TIFF or PSD or DNG format BEFORE USM. Then resize it for the web in photoshop via the image size menu - do not use save for web. Having resized it apply the USM. Then save as jpeg then close without saving any more changes.

Next reopen the copy you saved earlier, apply USM and save in what ever format you want for printing. Result is you have two different versions which have had USM applied when they are at their final size.

Save for web, while easy has its flaws and this is one of them - another is it trashes EXIF data.

If you use Nikon Capture this USM trickery is not necessary as it applies the USM when saving the file each time (it stores the settings in the NEF rather than applying them).

Hope this helps.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby johnd on Fri May 13, 2005 12:01 pm

Thanks heaps to you all for the tips. I'll go try them out on the weekend and have a better result next week.

I've only had my D70 for 2 months, and feel I'm on a very steep learning curve. But it's a lot of fun and I get a real buzz out of learning something new, which at the moment is daily (at least).

So much to learn and so little time. But this forum really helps. Best thing since sliced bread I reckon.


Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby mudder on Fri May 13, 2005 9:56 pm

There's heaps o' good tips re the sharpness but just wanted to say I LOVE this shot... I really like foresty, mossy stuff and this is great, a little extra colour saturation and some backgroung darkening and this would look fantastic...

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby johnd on Sat May 14, 2005 6:29 pm

Thanks to all for the tips.

Mudder, I added a little extra colour saturation and darkened the background a little.

Then as Stubbsy suggested I saved as PSD so I can play with it and print it later. Then used image size to bring it down to 800, then applied the USM settings as suggested by johndec (are those USM settings a suggestion for just web images?).

Image

I think the end result is a whole lot better.

Thanks for the team effort :wink:

Cheers
John
Last edited by johnd on Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby SteveGriffin on Sat May 14, 2005 6:40 pm

Much better!!
Very nice work
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby mudder on Sat May 14, 2005 6:48 pm

That looks great! You've got a shot worth printing and framing... Good stuff :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby johndec on Sat May 14, 2005 7:21 pm

That's 100% better John :lol:

Yeah, those settings are his "sharpening for web after resizing" suggestions. They are designed to be applied after any pre-resizing sharpening.
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby johnd on Sun May 15, 2005 7:11 pm

Thanks Steve, Mudder and Johndec. :)

Johndec, I've committed those settings to memory for the future (well written them down anyway).

Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques