Some night photosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some night photosWas out in the city tonight and thought I'd make the most out of it.
Couldn't get the WB right for the church as it was either red or too yellow....if I made it a bit cooler, it didn't have the oomph so thought I'd convert it to b&w I wanted to take another photo of the fountain after the second one as the falling water created a nice soft effect, but they turned fountain off on me All lights went out and water stopped. Was an "interesting" experience.... Victorian Parliament house....
Hi Piro.
Well done on the night shots. The church is well suited to the B&W treatment. The last image is the only one I don't particularly care for - I see that it was an 8 sec exposure, so the camera must have been on a tripod, so I can only assume that you intended the camera to be tilted. Unfortunately, that angle emphasises the WA tendency for the building to appear as if it is toppling over (seeing that it is Parliament House, perhaps not a bad idea ), but not an effect I greatly admire in photos. Others may have different views, of course. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Wayne, great stuff, I love the 2nd one if somehow you can get rid of the bit of building on the left and straighten it so it is perfectly vertical i reckon thats a top shot.
Mic.
G'day Piro,
Really like the B&W treatment on the church, gives it an eerie, spooky feel... The lit branches in the first really suit the spookie, scary sort of feel they have (well at least to me) Aka Andrew
Thanks for the comments
Cricketfan, I see your point I wasn't paying too much attention to the verticals at the time and during pp Mic, I seriously considered taking out part of the church as it really unbalanced the photo but thought I'd leave it in to see what others had to say I think i'll remove it. Andrew, when I first saw the branch in front of the church my first immediate thought was of LOTR and the white tree of Gondor. In the colour version, it didn't look right...so glad I converted it to b&w
The fountain ones are great. But I don't like the first one. The bright branches are quite distracting. It really takes away from the building.
Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358 http://www.jtimagesonline.com
i really like the first fountain pic. The palm in the background alomost looks like a firework exploding in the distance Nice effect.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|