YAFS 24-120vrModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
YAFS 24-120vrSome artsy fartsy stuff.
Nikon D70 ,Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR 1/125s f/8.0 at 35.0mm ISO 200 hand held Nikon D70 ,Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR 1/125s f/7.1 at 85.0mm ISO 200 hand held my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Rich in colour and well composed. Just one point Kerry - I was wondering if the last pic would be improved with a contrast mask to bring out some building details and not leave them so black.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thanks for the kind comments, Chris. Dunno about your suggestion for the 2nd pic. I've done shots like that with bracketing, but never hand held. Given that this image was deliberately underexposed by more than a stop, I'd guess that any attempts to bring up the shadow areas would be pretty messy. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Thanks, Oneputt! I'm pleased that you enjoyed them. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Kerry,
Love the colours in the second. Well done. As to trying to bring up building details ... I dunno. I quite like the sillouette effect. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for the kind comments, Gary. I tend to use the "cookie cutter" type silhouette technique in my low light scenics. It's a lot easier for me, because to bring out more color and the silhouttes, I just underexpose by using the by guess and by golly method. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Kerry
I also like the second one as is and think the saturation of the shot really works well too. First shot freaked me though cos the red dot in one of the buildings appeared like I might have a dead pixel on my new LCD (until I scrolled ) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks, Peter. Sorry for giving you heartburn on the new display. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|