ReflectionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
ReflectionTaken at Barrington Tops National Park a few weks ago. Unfortunately the lighting was a little more harsh and direct than i would of liked. All comments welcome.
18-70 lens, CPL used, 1/60 @f6.3, iso320
This would have made a wonderful IR shot. I'm a little perplexed with the shot info you gave. 1/60 f/6.3 at ISO 320 doesn't indicate a very bright scene, even with the light loss from the CPL. The shot looks a little dark to me, perhaps -.5 EV under.
FWIW, on a shot like this, I'd go for max DOF, using hyperfocal focus, which would be f/11 at 18mm to give you DOF from about 3ft to infinity. That's about 2 stops down from where you were, so you'd need a tripod or ISO 1600. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Nice shot. One suggestion, though perhaps totally wrong, would be to focus more on the reflection, and leave most of the actual tree out of the photo, and compare it to this picture (maybe you already did?).
Kerry, i actually ntended to make the scene a little darker. I thought that i may of lost the blue of the sky if a used the metered value. But i agree, i would of liked to of used more DOF, alas i didnt take my tripod with me and didnt want to up the ISO anymore. Appreciate the comments
I wasnt sure to focus on the trees or reflections myself, took both and went with this one.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|