Top Deck

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Top Deck

Postby phillipb on Wed May 18, 2005 10:51 pm

Any comments appreciated.

Image
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby redline on Wed May 18, 2005 11:01 pm

its interesting what your done with the image itself.
i am just not sure weather to call this a building shot or something like still life.

maybe if your cropped away the pot plant on the left along with the railing which seems to be tilting lower cos you didn't shoot it straight i guess.
theres a bit of uneven space under the first and last chair to support this theory.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby phillipb on Wed May 18, 2005 11:07 pm

I thought about cropping the pot, but then I would have half a building on the left, it lookd a bit out of balance.
I think the rail is showing lens distortion. The buildings are fairly straight.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby JordanP on Wed May 18, 2005 11:08 pm

I really enjoy the contrast between the lower portion of the image and the upper part of the image. I find it almost spooking and mysterious. I'm curious to know if you were just playing around or had something in mind when you created this?

Surreal - to - real ......... or something like that.

So many vertical and horizontal lines too. I'm trying to find something round or curved in the image.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby phillipb on Wed May 18, 2005 11:13 pm

JordanP wrote:I really enjoy the contrast between the lower portion of the image and the upper part of the image. I find it almost spooking and mysterious. I'm curious to know if you were just playing around or had something in mind when you created this?

Surreal - to - real ......... or something like that.


Well, it kind of evolved.
Basically in the original colour version I found that there was not enough separation between the deck and the background so I started manipulating things until I got to this stage. I didn't intend to make it spooky but I liked the effect I got when I varied the red channel.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby redline on Wed May 18, 2005 11:15 pm

phillipb wrote:I thought about cropping the pot, but then I would have half a building on the left, it lookd a bit out of balance.
I think the rail is showing lens distortion. The buildings are fairly straight.


i don't think the railing is distorted as the you said the buliding are quite straight, the distrotion should apply to an area. it kinda looks like the railing actually extends away from the camera.
i guess you shot this handheld
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby phillipb on Wed May 18, 2005 11:22 pm

Yes, hand held, it was also heavily cropped as you can see from the original.

Image
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby PiroStitch on Wed May 18, 2005 11:44 pm

IMHO having a colour tone for the entire image is a bit much. It's artistic I'll give you that, but I'm not sure what the main subject matter in the photo is supposed to be :) If it's the chairs, maybe try desaturating the bkg and leaving the chairs in the original timber colour.
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby phillipb on Wed May 18, 2005 11:47 pm

If it's the chairs, maybe try desaturating the bkg and leaving the chairs in the original timber colour.


They are.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby PiroStitch on Wed May 18, 2005 11:48 pm

Oops sorry I meant desaturating as in having all the other elements in b&w :)
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby MCWB on Thu May 19, 2005 12:38 am

I thought this was going to be another chocolate photo. :(

That having been said, I like it. Love the bottom half of the image, and the buildings. I don't like the almost black bits in the sky, waaay too dark IMO. The rest is awesome though, top job! :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Matt. K on Thu May 19, 2005 12:57 am

What would have lifted this image from being very different to being a masterpiece is a beautiful female in a red skirt lounging in one of those chairs. You got the background...now work it.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby sirhc55 on Thu May 19, 2005 2:32 am

Interesting image but I feel that the banding and heavy sky is a bit to much and detracts from the lovely image below.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques