Some casual shots taken today

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some casual shots taken today

Postby Matt. K on Sun May 29, 2005 11:09 pm

Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby mudder on Sun May 29, 2005 11:21 pm

G'day,

I always enjoy your casual, every day shoots... Can't provide any worthwhile comment or feedback :oops: but always enjoy 'em...

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby BBJ on Sun May 29, 2005 11:24 pm

Hey Matt, I am like Andrew, nice clean shots and is something different.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby ozimax on Mon May 30, 2005 12:41 pm

Like the second one Matt, would crop off bottom third and see how it looks, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby shutterbug on Mon May 30, 2005 1:13 pm

Like the 2nd image matt :)
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby MCWB on Mon May 30, 2005 1:38 pm

Matt: First one is great, lovely bokeh! The second and third ones are nicely composed, but the distortion ruins them IMO. Mind you I'm very sensitive to distortion, fisheyes send me dizzy, so it may not be too bad for someone else!
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby johnd on Mon May 30, 2005 2:16 pm

I too especially like the first one.

A question though if I may?

The term bokeh, I think, means the blurring of the background, or background out of focus. My question is, is this a technical term or an abbreviation of something? :?

I hope I'm not going to be too embarrassed by the answer. :oops:


Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 30, 2005 2:26 pm

Matt

Can you please stop posting your everyday shots. I'm completely fed up with seeing them.

Every time I think I'm getting better with the shots that I'm taking great time & effort to shoot and PP I see beauties like these and I get depressed again :cry: :wink:

The first shot is just delightful. The detail in the black feathers and beautiful colour contrast with the grass just leap off the screen. The one of the art gallery is fine by me (didn't notice the distortion, but then I use a 12-24 DX :wink: ), but it seems a trifle dark to me.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 30, 2005 2:31 pm

johnd wrote:I too especially like the first one.

A question though if I may?

The term bokeh, I think, means the blurring of the background, or background out of focus. My question is, is this a technical term or an abbreviation of something? :?

I hope I'm not going to be too embarrassed by the answer. :oops:


Cheers
John

John

Boke is a Japanese word, not an acronym. There's an interesting link on the spelling of boke here that is worth a read just for the sake of it. I've lifted a bit from there that more directly answers your question:

This is from http://www.imaginatorium.org/stuff/cufilter.htm
Linguistic note: The original Japanese term boke (the 'h' is superfluous, as long as you don't pronounce it to rhyme with "broke") also refers to what happens to people who have become grey and boring, and lost their normal mental faculties. Sort of like the photons.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby KerryPierce on Mon May 30, 2005 2:47 pm

I like the first 2 a great deal, Matt. The exposure and detail on the bird is very good. Quite impressive, IMO. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby johnd on Mon May 30, 2005 11:11 pm

Stubbsy, you're right. That is an interesting thread :lol:
Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques