Brake - Reverse Thrust - Hard Right - NOW!!!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Brake - Reverse Thrust - Hard Right - NOW!!!Click for bigger pic... I had half an hour to kill at the airport today and managed to get this head on view of a cargo 747... Another 20mm zoomed out and I would have got the wing-tips as well... Next time... I'm quite happy with the shot though... The 747 was turning off the run-way after landing and I only got the rushed shot because of the VR... 80-400VR - f/5.3 - 1/1600 - 280mm Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Correct... Cathay Pacific it was... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
hi leek
if you are interested in aviation photography, check out http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... entry=true his stuff is amazing
John
Excellent pic - shame about the fact you clipped it's wings The front on works exceptionally well and the OOF buildings almost look like engine vapour. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I like
One of these days I must spend my lunchtime down there and see what I can get - keep meaning to, keep getting too busy *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
I used the lookout round the back of the old control tower... It's a pretty good spot... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Thanks Peter... The OOF buildings are actually oil tanks and there was a bit of heat haze involved... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
There's a couple of Ethylene tanks there as well - pretty full at the moment too! *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
That's a great photo Leek! Love the haze in the background Too bad the dumb pilot had to point the wheels to his right, otherwise it would've been a nice symmetrical shot...heheh could always photoshop it Just kidding mate, top pic!
Great symmetry, plane shots are a dime a dozen but this a goodie, nicely taken, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Great shot, like someone mentioned before too bad wings were clipped.
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
I would actually argue that the clipped wings don't take away from this image. One of the reasons (I think) you took the picture of this particular machine is that it is so large, and the clipped wings add a little mystery to just how large it is. It creates a little bit of tension, and I say the clipped wings are a good thing.
You guys are too hard and to fussy!, take it easy with leek, otherwise he will sneak out from work again and waiting for taking a photo of the same aircraft non-clipped wing, then he get no job after He has done a great capture, he'll bring the full scale of an Airbus 380 to you soon, stay tuned Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Thanks Birdy - and thanks to everyone else that commented... I've been playing with the image a little more and here's a cropped version of the same NEF that might emphasise the scale of this beast even more... Same problem with wing clipping though... but I got slightly more of the wings this time... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Leek, well i like this pic, i dont think it takes anything away from it having the wings clipped. I think it looks fine the way it is.
Cheers John D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
ahh the beach you can actually wander around to the fenceline at the end of the carpark and get pics like this http://www.airliners.net/open.file/553692/M/ (and yes, that is my pic). I never really appreciated the size of 747's until I got up close Chris
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|